From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47208 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752698AbdLGMTz (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 07:19:55 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:19:54 -0200 From: "Bruno E. O. Meneguele" To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Mimi Zohar , dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update Message-ID: <20171207121954.GD13946@glitch> References: <20171201181522.GB3056@glitch> <1512392157.3977.36.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171204171435.GA6190@glitch> <1512415106.3977.53.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171207011105.bfqhvjanl3arhqqn@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lc9FT7cWel8HagAv" In-Reply-To: <20171207011105.bfqhvjanl3arhqqn@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07-12, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:18:26PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the > > subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:", > > "evm:", "tpm:"). > > > > Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg. > > "ima-evm-utils:"). > > > > Jarkko, is that ok? > > It is fine for me. > Well, ok then. Thank you guys! I'll post the openssl1.1 patch port that I have in hands ASAP. [ Part 2, Application/PGP-SIGNATURE (Name: "signature.asc") 499 bytes. ] [ Unable to print this part. ]