On Sun 2017-12-10 08:37:56, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Can you do something about html emails? Quoting them doesn't work too well. > > Yeah, and they don't show up onlkml either because of rules. I try to > avoid them, but have been more on mobile for various reasons lately > than usual. That should be over and done with after today, though. > > >> Any chance to bisect it? This doesn't sound like the other problem > >> we had. > > > > Let me try... > > > > v4.15-rc2: suspends/resumes ok. > > 4ded3be: hangs on resume. > > > > Given that between those, there was supposed "fix" for suspend, I > > believe I should try reverting that one first. .. if someone can tell > > me commit id, that would help. > > The fix in there should be 5b06bbcfc2c6 ("x86/power: Fix some ordering > bugs in __restore_processor_context()") so you can certainly see if it > works before that (or just reverting it). Revert is easier. > But there are also a few other x86 low-level things there, and that > fix really looks very safe, so I'd almost expect something else to > have triggered your problem. There's less than 500 commits in that > range you have, so a few bisections should narrow it down a lot. No, that commit does _look_ pretty suspect to me... Confirmed, revert fixes it. You see how it moves fix_processor_context around #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 block? And how people forget 32-bit machines exist? Aha. Which brings me to .. various people do automated testing of kernel. Testing 32-bit kernel for boot, and both 32-bit and 64-bit for boot and suspend would be very nice. The last item is not hard, either: sudo rtcwake -l -m mem -s 5 ...should take 10 seconds or so. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html