From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOLMA-0001pC-Cp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:30:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOLM6-0008Gp-G6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:30:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:30:25 +0000 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20171211103025.GD13593@stefanha-x1.localdomain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2iBwrppp/7QCDedR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-blk: miscellaneous changes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Kanda Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, ameya.more@oracle.com, karl.heubaum@oracle.com --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:57:25AM -0600, Mark Kanda wrote: > v2: add check for maximum queue size [Stefan] >=20 > This series is for two minor virtio-blk changes. The first patch > makes the virtio-blk queue size user configurable. The second patch > rejects logical block size > physical block configurations (similar > to a recent change in virtio-scsi). >=20 > Mark Kanda (2): > virtio-blk: make queue size configurable > virtio-blk: reject configs with logical block size > physical block > size >=20 > hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Hi Mark, Please resend as a top level email thread so the continuous integration and patch management tools will detect your patch series. =46rom https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch: "Send each new revision as a new top-level thread, rather than burying it in-reply-to an earlier revision, as many reviewers are not looking inside deep threads for new patches." Thanks, Stefan --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJaLl5BAAoJEJykq7OBq3PI3LMH/RdGzAfr/MEDYVGjAQ89/x7I 2sK9HVT4VGWkr+S9KBbvFv8qml3aKjV93/iEwYdYRLL7s9caI2oFHW9hBNODfE1d 8muOqUIHpTKQNBaPJ9FgsZ3RJDOpgD9RiCSRGa/qKq6Jl2sE18SvwTthD1JYxP0F sGylImyOsoi5HVwWvH+F/itTpDc9SCKwnT2qiMazekulbaifEmvSzlD0FFKCJsIm c0jQnYOnksDWs0K9OAmAIfXzHXB5VMwW5QA+neBkJg92C+2j9owxQ+FW9vWaOsWg v32w379rc+x0+HGHR6aDDKwwOWjU7mejuUSsw54ob+2j8gwyUYV926YX0A+exT8= =fN1A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2iBwrppp/7QCDedR--