From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752209AbdLLO2u (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:28:50 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:44768 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751281AbdLLO2t (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:28:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:28:56 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Borislav Petkov Cc: X86 ML , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirsky , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , Greg KH , keescook@google.com, hughd@google.com, Brian Gerst , Josh Poimboeuf , Denys Vlasenko , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , David Laight , Eduardo Valentin , aliguori@amazon.com, daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pti: Add pti= cmdline option and documentation Message-ID: <20171212142856.GA15783@arm.com> References: <20171212133952.10177-1-bp@alien8.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171212133952.10177-1-bp@alien8.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Borislav, [+ tglx] On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:39:52PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov > > Keep the "nopti" for traditional reasons. > > Requested-by: Linus Torvalds > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > Cc: Linus Torvalds > Cc: Andy Lutomirsky > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Dave Hansen > Cc: Greg KH > Cc: keescook@google.com > Cc: hughd@google.com > Cc: Brian Gerst > Cc: Josh Poimboeuf > Cc: Denys Vlasenko > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky > Cc: Juergen Gross > Cc: David Laight > Cc: Eduardo Valentin > Cc: aliguori@amazon.com > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 ++++++ > arch/x86/mm/pti.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) On arm64, I've gone for kpti=. I'm happy to change this to align with x86, but the patches are queued now so I don't want to keep changing it. Is "pti=" definitely what you're going for on x86? Will