All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:18:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212151830.GB8264@e110439-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171212145620.GA30887@localhost.localdomain>

On 12-Dec 15:56, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 12/12/17 20:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 12-12-17, 14:38, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > Hi Viresh,
> > > 
> > > On 12/12/17 17:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > > > Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:43:26 +0530
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] sched: Keep track of cpufreq utilization update flags
> > > > 
> > > > Currently the schedutil governor overwrites the sg_cpu->flags field on
> > > > every call to the utilization handler. It was pretty good as the initial
> > > > implementation of utilization handlers, there are several drawbacks
> > > > though.
> > > > 
> > > > The biggest drawback is that the sg_cpu->flags field doesn't always
> > > > represent the correct type of tasks that are enqueued on a CPU's rq. For
> > > > example, if a fair task is enqueued while a RT or DL task is running, we
> > > > will overwrite the flags with value 0 and that may take the CPU to lower
> > > > OPPs unintentionally. There can be other corner cases as well which we
> > > > aren't aware of currently.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch changes the current implementation to keep track of all the
> > > > task types that are currently enqueued to the CPUs rq. There are two
> > > > flags for every scheduling class now, one to set the flag and other one
> > > > to clear it. The flag is set by the scheduling classes from the existing
> > > > set of calls to cpufreq_update_util(), and the flag is cleared when the
> > > > last task of the scheduling class is dequeued. For now, the util update
> > > > handlers return immediately if they were called to clear the flag.
> > > > 
> > > > We can add more optimizations over this patch separately.
> > > > 
> > > > The last parameter of sugov_set_iowait_boost() is also dropped as the
> > > > function can get it from sg_cpu anyway.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > @@ -655,7 +669,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > > >  		memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
> > > >  		sg_cpu->cpu = cpu;
> > > >  		sg_cpu->sg_policy = sg_policy;
> > > > -		sg_cpu->flags = SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT;
> > > > +		sg_cpu->flags = 0;
> > > >  		sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> > > >  	}
> > > 
> > > Why this change during initialization?
> > 
> > Firstly I am not sure why it was set to SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT, as schedutil wouldn't
> > change the frequency until the first time the util handler is called. And once
> > that is called we were updating the flag anyway. So, unless I misunderstood its
> > purpose, it was doing anything helpful.
> 
> That was actually my understanding as well. Your patch made me notice
> it.
> 
> > 
> > I need to remove it otherwise the RT flag may remain set for a very long time
> > unnecessarily. That would be until the time the last RT task is not dequeued.
> > Consider this for example: we are at max freq when sugov_start() is called and
> > it sets the RT flag, but there is no RT task to run. Now, we have tons of CFS
> > tasks but we always keep running at max because of the flag. Even the schedutil
> > RT thread doesn't get a chance to run/deququed, because we never want a freq
> > change with the RT flag and stay at max.
> > 
> > Makes sense ?
> 
> Yes. I guess it's working ok for now because of the problem this patch,
> and Patrick's, address (always overwriting).

Yes, makes sens to me too ;-)

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-12 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:12   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:41     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:02       ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:19         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:45           ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07  5:01   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 12:45     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 15:55       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-12-12 11:37       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 13:38         ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 14:40           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 14:56             ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 15:18               ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2017-12-12 15:16         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13  9:06           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20 14:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:51     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:17   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:45     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:03       ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07  5:05   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:18     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:22   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:57     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07  5:15       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:19         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-14  4:45           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:28   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-06  9:39   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-12-06 11:38     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-06 12:36       ` Vincent Guittot
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:36   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:54     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:06       ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:41   ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:02     ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:12       ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:42         ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07  9:24           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 15:47             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21  9:15     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:30         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:43             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-22  8:30               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-31  9:43     ` Claudio Scordino
2018-01-02 13:31       ` Claudio Scordino
2017-12-20 17:38   ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 10:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 11:02       ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 11:46         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07           ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:14             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:22               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07           ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:19             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:27               ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:38               ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:43                 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:50                   ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 13:01                     ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:25             ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-21  7:34   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-06 10:55   ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 15:43     ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-06 18:14       ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 18:36         ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-08 16:14           ` Claudio Scordino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171212151830.GB8264@e110439-lin \
    --to=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.