From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753613AbdLMQEL (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:04:11 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:45466 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751916AbdLMQEI (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:04:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:03:57 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Patrick Bellasi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Paul Turner , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Utilization estimation (util_est) for FAIR tasks Message-ID: <20171213160357.3se4vvyo5lqud2uo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20171205171018.9203-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171205171018.9203-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:10:14PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > With this feature enabled, the measured overhead is in the range of ~1% > on the same HW/SW test configuration. That's quite a lot; did you look where that comes from?