From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com (mailout4.zoneedit.com [64.68.198.17]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BAD719B1 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19CE20AD6; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmo03-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STrRN24Ab0CS; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.denix.org (pool-100-15-85-143.washdc.fios.verizon.net [100.15.85.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1ACC20567; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52FF61631EC; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:18:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:18:07 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik Message-ID: <20171215001807.GH9221@denix.org> References: <1513218231-12626-1-git-send-email-manjukumar.harthikote-matha@xilinx.com> <1513250295.30397.73.camel@andred.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1513250295.30397.73.camel@andred.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix build issues with fitimage X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:18:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:18:15AM +0000, André Draszik wrote: > On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 18:23 -0800, Manjukumar Matha wrote: > > While building fitimage with initramfs bundle using INITRAMFS_IMAGE and > > INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE = "1", we have few failures > > Nothing against these patches, but what is the use-case to do that? Why > don't you just disable INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE? +1 here Also, I don't think this is the first revision of the patch here, so please specify [PATCH vX] accordingly, with log of changes between revisions. -- Denys