From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1756605AbdLOOoJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:44:09 -0500
Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:35864 "EHLO
        mail-it0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1755581AbdLOOoE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:44:04 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotzBtI2Jau6YiCR/BXuSHN3GS2lvw7EiDYJtAkcAatptJvO34/8UX3BSpY+PY8D5OTz9zM1ZA==
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 08:44:02 -0600
From: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review
Message-ID: <20171215144402.jqeoelsehy5uqcc4@xps>
Mail-Followup-To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@linaro.org>
References: <20171212123443.785979602@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CA+G9fYtOBO3f1f3aZTWtJCjtQ5DiqBYGCDmaxgph4DqfhUnhXA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171214080136.GC2965@kroah.com>
 <d2f0ce23-133e-2a0d-f5a4-0ef09e369dd3@osg.samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <d2f0ce23-133e-2a0d-f5a4-0ef09e369dd3@osg.samsung.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171027
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:13:47AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
> 
> >> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> >> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64.
> >> armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure issues.
> >>
> >> Note:
> >> Newly added selftests/net/reuseport_bpf FAILED in full run on x86_64 and
> >> the independent test execution resulted as PASS.
> 
> This test went in through net-next very likely. Could you please send me the
> failure log for the full run.

Hi Shuah,

Have a look at https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3502#c7. It seems
that the problems can be seen when running reuseport_bpf as a part of
the rest of kselftest (sometimes), or when running it in a loop.

Dan