From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757405AbdLQPPy (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:15:54 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:52306 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752395AbdLQPPx (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:15:53 -0500 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 16:15:47 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Josh Poimboeuf Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes Message-ID: <20171217151547.m2xsga6ekkydy4hb@pd.tnic> References: <20171215154308.ixj3wwvy2gajmtpn@gmail.com> <20171215160735.p47cymimxcezfds7@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:41:42PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > X86_BUG_CPU_SECURE_MODE_PTI should be added to DISABLED_FEATURES or > > DISABLED_BUGS or whatever if it's not configured in, which will reduce > > bloat. Borislav, that's kind of up your alley, since I don't think > > the appropriate mask even exists right now. > > Will have a look. Right, I converted X86_BUG_CPU_SECURE_MODE_PTI bug bit to an X86_FEATURE bit and then the DISABLED_FEATURES thing should just work. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.