From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757578AbdLQU5i (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Dec 2017 15:57:38 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:43694 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757380AbdLQU5Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Dec 2017 15:57:24 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoth+Azw7INE1GEK1xNOQS8Cb7nb0G71q84FfzRz4+nzNS421AO2zwa3x7Zw4DyA4njn9VACJg== Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:57:20 +0000 From: Daniel Thompson To: Robert Jarzmik Cc: Lee Jones , Jingoo Han , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] backlight: tdo24m: add the reset line gpio Message-ID: <20171217205720.7ujsneqdbsjkenej@oak.lan> References: <20171013194250.9001-1-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <20171013194250.9001-2-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <20171215115309.ez7odo7sh5zz7vge@oak.lan> <87shcaewah.fsf@belgarion.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87shcaewah.fsf@belgarion.home> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 12:39:50PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Daniel Thompson writes: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> The Toppoly panels have a global reset line. Add an optional gpio > >> control for this line, for platforms which have the ability to drive it. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik > >> --- > >> drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c | 3 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c b/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c > >> index e4bd63e9db6b..e4b2dfabf192 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c > >> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/tdo24m.c > >> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > >> */ > >> > >> #include > >> +#include > >> #include > >> #include > >> #include > >> @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ struct tdo24m { > >> struct spi_message msg; > >> struct spi_transfer xfer; > >> uint8_t *buf; > >> + struct gpio_desc *xres; > > > > Why do we need a write-only variable? > It's written to by devm_gpiod_get() below. Yes, but it not *read* anywhere because we rely on devm to release the GPIO. Why do we need a write-only variable? > >> + lcd->xres = devm_gpiod_get(&spi->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > > > devm_gpiod_get_optional() would be better, if only for its commenting > > value. > Yes, you're perfectly right. > > > Also, this adds a new optional property, doesn't the devicetree binding > > docs need to be update to match this? > Ah yes, that too. I'll add it for v3. Thanks! Daniel.