Re: [PATCH acks] fs/*/Kconfig: drop links to 404-compliant http://acl.bestbits.at

[Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>]

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 07:14:22AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:58:52 +0100
> Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote:
> 
> > This link is replicated in most filesystems' config stanzas.  Referring
> > to an archived version of that site is pointless as it mostly deals with
> > patches; user documentation is available elsewhere.
> > ---
> > No changes, acks added (Dave Kleikamp's came without CCs).
> > 
> > Acked: btrfs ceph cifs ext2 f2fs jfs xfs.
> > No ack: . 9p ext4 hfsplus jffs2 reiserfs -- but there's no point in caring
> > this much for a trivial doc update, molesting the maintainers further is a
> > waste of their time.
> 
> So how would you like this to go upstream?  I can certainly take it
> through docs, but it seems like vfs might be the first choice...?

Good question.  I submitted it in one piece, to reduce spam (plenty of
mostly two-line changes to elebenty filesystems' prose), and no one pays me
per-commit, but splitting Documentation/ from fs/*/Kbuild might be
reasonable.

Al: would you prefer to take it as a single commit, as Doc + fs, or chopped
into tiny bits?

[Dropped the CCs to not waste everyone else's time.]


Meow!
-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.