From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752856AbdLWJRY (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Dec 2017 04:17:24 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50988 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750903AbdLWJRX (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Dec 2017 04:17:23 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:17:20 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/159] 4.14.9-stable review Message-ID: <20171223091720.GD13832@kroah.com> References: <20171222084623.668990192@linuxfoundation.org> <20171222223105.acmjblpn5dbv7kc7@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171222223105.acmjblpn5dbv7kc7@xps> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:31:05PM -0600, Dan Rue wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.9 release. > > There are 159 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 24 08:45:36 UTC 2017. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.9-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > Results from Linaro - 4.14.9-rc3 looks good. No regressions on arm64, arm, or > x86_64. That's amazing, it was a pain to get out :) Thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h