From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 3/6] GFS2: Refactor function fast_to_acquire
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:42:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110204227.20315-4-rpeterso@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180110204227.20315-1-rpeterso@redhat.com>
Function fast_to_acquire determines if a rgrp ought to be fast to
acquire, but the logic was cryptic. This patch makes the logic more
straightforward:
1. If the rgrp is one of our "preferred" rgrps, consider it fast
to acquire. This is how each node tries to confine its allocations
to a set of rgrps unique from the other nodes, to reduce contention.
2. If the rgrp glock is unlocked, consider it slow, because it will
take some time to lock it, either for the DLM or for the glock
state machine.
3. If there are glock holders, consider it slow because we'd have to
wait for another process to dequeue before we get our turn.
4. If the glock is being demoted, consider it slow.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
---
fs/gfs2/rgrp.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
index 960fbc2d39d7..fa72e3e6ce4e 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
@@ -1938,20 +1938,32 @@ static bool gfs2_select_rgrp(struct gfs2_rgrpd **pos, const struct gfs2_rgrpd *b
/**
* fast_to_acquire - determine if a resource group will be fast to acquire
*
- * If this is one of our preferred rgrps, it should be quicker to acquire,
- * because we tried to set ourselves up as dlm lock master.
+ * 1. If this is one of our preferred rgrps, it should be quicker to acquire,
+ * because we tried to set ourselves up as dlm lock master.
+ * 2. If the glock is unlocked, consider it slow because it will take time for
+ * the dlm and the glock state machine to transition it to a locked state.
+ * 3. If there are glock holder records queued to the glock, consider it slow
+ * because this process will need to be queued up behind another process:
+ * Our request can't be enqueued until the other is dequeued.
+ * 4. If the rgrp glock is being demoted, consider it slow because the glock
+ * will need to be demoted, possibly used on another node, the promoted,
+ * all of which will take time.
+ *
*/
-static inline int fast_to_acquire(struct gfs2_rgrpd *rgd)
+static inline bool fast_to_acquire(struct gfs2_rgrpd *rgd)
{
struct gfs2_glock *gl = rgd->rd_gl;
- if (gl->gl_state != LM_ST_UNLOCKED && list_empty(&gl->gl_holders) &&
- !test_bit(GLF_DEMOTE_IN_PROGRESS, &gl->gl_flags) &&
- !test_bit(GLF_DEMOTE, &gl->gl_flags))
- return 1;
if (rgd->rd_flags & GFS2_RDF_PREFERRED)
- return 1;
- return 0;
+ return true;
+ if (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_UNLOCKED)
+ return false;
+ if (!list_empty(&gl->gl_holders))
+ return false;
+ if (test_bit(GLF_DEMOTE_IN_PROGRESS, &gl->gl_flags) ||
+ test_bit(GLF_DEMOTE, &gl->gl_flags))
+ return false;
+ return true;
}
/**
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 20:42 [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 0/6] [resend] GFS2: Rework rgrp glock congestion functions for intra-node Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 1/6] GFS2: Simplify gfs2_rgrp_used_recently Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 2/6] GFS2: Check gfs2_rgrp_used_recently inside gfs2_rgrp_congested Bob Peterson
2018-01-12 10:45 ` Steven Whitehouse
2018-01-15 15:48 ` Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` Bob Peterson [this message]
2018-01-12 10:51 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 3/6] GFS2: Refactor function fast_to_acquire Steven Whitehouse
2018-01-15 16:00 ` Bob Peterson
2018-01-15 16:24 ` Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 4/6] GFS2: Simplify by checking fast_to_acquire in gfs2_rgrp_congested Bob Peterson
2018-01-12 10:55 ` Steven Whitehouse
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 5/6] GFS2: Split gfs2_rgrp_congested into dlm and non-dlm cases Bob Peterson
2018-01-10 20:42 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 6/6] GFS2: Add checks for intra-node congestion Bob Peterson
2018-01-12 11:11 ` Steven Whitehouse
2018-01-11 15:52 ` [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH 0/6] [resend] GFS2: Rework rgrp glock congestion functions for intra-node Abhijith Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110204227.20315-4-rpeterso@redhat.com \
--to=rpeterso@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.