From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ea0q7-0004Z2-JV for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:01:54 +0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:01:27 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jonas Gorski , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: move code adding master MTD out of mtd_add_device_partitions Message-ID: <20180112160127.0bfc3c57@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20180112144034.6655-2-zajec5@gmail.com> References: <20180112144034.6655-1-zajec5@gmail.com> <20180112144034.6655-2-zajec5@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:40:33 +0100 Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: > From: Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki >=20 > This change is a small cleanup of mtd_device_parse_register. When using > MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER it makes sure a master MTD is registered before > dealing with partitions. There are 2 advantages of this: > 1) Not mixing code handling master MTD with code handling partitions > 2) Possibility of reusing mtd_parse_part in the future to avoid some > code duplication. >=20 > This commit doesn't change any behavior except from a slightly different > failure code path. The new code may need to call del_mtd_device when > something goes wrong. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki > --- > drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > index f80e911b8843..f6460862e2ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > @@ -641,20 +641,12 @@ static int mtd_add_device_partitions(struct mtd_inf= o *mtd, > { > const struct mtd_partition *real_parts =3D parts->parts; > int nbparts =3D parts->nr_parts; > - int ret; > =20 > - if (nbparts =3D=3D 0 || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER)) { > - ret =3D add_mtd_device(mtd); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - } > + if (nbparts =3D=3D 0 && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER)) > + return add_mtd_device(mtd); Why not moving this part in mtd_device_parse_register() as well. And I'd prefer something like: if (!nbparts && !device_is_registered(&mtd->dev)) ... > =20 > - if (nbparts > 0) { > - ret =3D add_mtd_partitions(mtd, real_parts, nbparts); > - if (ret && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER)) > - del_mtd_device(mtd); > - return ret; > - } > + if (nbparts > 0) > + return add_mtd_partitions(mtd, real_parts, nbparts); > =20 > return 0; > } > @@ -714,6 +706,12 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, = const char * const *types, > =20 > mtd_set_dev_defaults(mtd); > =20 > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER)) { > + ret =3D add_mtd_device(mtd); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + > memset(&parsed, 0, sizeof(parsed)); > =20 > ret =3D parse_mtd_partitions(mtd, types, &parsed, parser_data); > @@ -753,6 +751,8 @@ int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, c= onst char * const *types, > out: > /* Cleanup any parsed partitions */ > mtd_part_parser_cleanup(&parsed); > + if (ret && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER)) if (ret && device_is_registered(&mtd->dev)) > + del_mtd_device(mtd); Blank line here, please. > return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtd_device_parse_register);