From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [cryptodev:master 130/134] aes_generic.c:undefined reference to `_restgpr_31_x'
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:41:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180112214111.GQ21977@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2YVVseBFNoDbwOtqR3-JHFuZ-WZD6-PzztNTO_X_soaw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:29:01PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:43:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Segher Boessenkool
>
> >> We could theoretically work around it by turning that into
> >> "#if defined(CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE) ||
> >> defined(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES)", but that seems rather ugly.
> >>
> >> My earlier patch already tried to be more specific, turning very
> >> specific optimizations off rather than moving from -O2 to -Os,
> >> but that turned out to lead to significantly worse performance,
> >> where -Os improved performance slightly. Is there a way
> >> to ask powerpc compilers to use mostly -Os but not the
> >> specific thing that makes it link to _restgpr_31_x?
> >
> > There is no such thing, sorry. Would be very hard to implement, and
> > older compilers will never get it, so it won't help you anyway :-(
>
> We use -Os only for gcc-7.1 and higher, where it produces faster
> code for AES and avoids running into
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83356
>
> > Maybe for now just enable it in crtsavres.S always, with a comment?
> > That -Os workaround is hopefully not going to live long either...
>
> It depends on whether or how soon someone comes up with a
> better fix for PR83356.
> gcc-8.0.0 is currently not affected by it, so we could limit the
> workaround (and the hack in crtsavres.S) to gcc-7-only.
I guess you could enable the _x routines whenever you use ubsan? Ubsan
will cause much bigger code growth than the handful of insns in those
routines?
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-12 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-12 14:11 [cryptodev:master 130/134] aes_generic.c:undefined reference to `_restgpr_31_x' kbuild test robot
2018-01-12 14:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-12 16:39 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-01-12 19:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-12 20:41 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-01-12 21:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-12 21:41 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2018-01-12 21:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-12 22:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-01-14 21:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-15 0:21 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180112214111.GQ21977@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.