From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S967543AbeAOMzF (ORCPT <rfc822;ralf@linux-mips.org> + 1 other);
        Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:55:05 -0500
Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:52486 "EHLO
        atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S966135AbeAOMym (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:54:42 -0500
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:54:39 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: LKML admins (syzbot emails are not delivered)
Message-ID: <20180115125439.GA1044@amd>
References: <CACT4Y+ZNJRzPxxPQNR88vcPxD54mHY-evhMwR39iMsJh_NwaEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180104092552.GA991@amd>
 <1515058705.7875.25.camel@gmx.de>
 <20180104095628.GA4407@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
 <CACT4Y+YB_p_p4ORbke1oZfkLSC8rnAD81Ra_fprsPSugGAQy8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87inchsl4h.fsf@xmission.com>
 <CACT4Y+ayTp5Ocz4Z8hN_gx7i-7gOeHvmLP93ekrE9f=R9gqaiA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+ayTp5Ocz4Z8hN_gx7i-7gOeHvmLP93ekrE9f=R9gqaiA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>


--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

> > *Snort*
> >
> > If the information to solve an issue is not in the Oops syzbot is
> > useless.
>=20
> Hi Eric
>=20
> That's true. But maintainers of the subsystem is in the best position
> to judge that. For that they need to see the report.

Unless they are already overloaded by better quality reports.

> > Further there is no place in the syzbot process to test fixes.
>=20
> Please elaborate.
> Kernel developer who fixes the bugs, tests it the same way as he/she
> does for any other bugs. There is really nothing in syzbot that
> prevents you from testing.

Well, normally people are interested in the bugs they report, and thus
willing to test the patches. Your bot.. is not interested.

									Pavel
--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlpcpI8ACgkQMOfwapXb+vLbVACfSmumY6ODHJEtMFuUxU+6of7D
sjQAn1oCK/4QuP07kUQJpc8ULFm5assj
=+GLu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--