From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:34577 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753195AbeARCQN (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:16:13 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f66.google.com with SMTP id r19so6934969pgn.1 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:16:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:16:10 -0800 From: Omar Sandoval Subject: Re: ext4 quota tests fail with CONFIG_QFMT_V2=n Message-ID: <20180118021610.GA10877@vader> References: <20180118010936.GA10649@vader> <20180118012831.GF6948@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180118012831.GF6948@thunk.org> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Eryu Guan List-ID: On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:28:31PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 05:09:36PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > Hello, > > > > If I run xfstests on ext4 with a kernel with CONFIG_QFMT_V2=n, the following > > tests fail: > > > > generic/082 > > generic/219 > > generic/230 > > generic/231 > > generic/232 > > generic/233 > > generic/234 > > generic/235 > > generic/244 > > generic/270 > > generic/382 > > > > Would it be possible to handle this case and skip the test instead? > > I'd like to ask a different question, which is there a reason to > support CONFIG_QFMT_V1 && !CONFIG_QFMT_V2? Maybe we should just > always enable CONFIG_QFMT_V2, and simplify the test matrix? FWIW, # CONFIG_QFMT_V1 is not set # CONFIG_QFMT_V2 is not set on this kernel.