From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ecAm2-0000Ir-Tb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:02:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ecAly-0000mv-8n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:02:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42798) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ecAly-0000mR-3d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:02:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:02:26 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20180118150226.46f1094f@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1516203816-19374-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20180117201515.1a49fcbf@redhat.com> <20180118114330.53ad7ce7@redhat.com> <20180118140605.028b7e33@redhat.com> <20180118143421.10499441@redhat.com> <20180118144557.0d68f07c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/24] generalize parsing of cpu_model (part 4) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , Laurent Vivier On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:49:25 +0000 Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 January 2018 at 13:45, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:36:40 +0000 > > Peter Maydell wrote: > > > >> On 18 January 2018 at 13:34, Igor Mammedov wrote: > >> > and renaming > >> > > >> > TARGET_DEFAULT_CPU_TYPE to USERONLY_DEFAULT_CPU_TYPE > >> > > >> > but I'd still keep it within $ARCH/cpu.h so we won't > >> > have to create a bunch of new linux-user/$ARCH/target_elf.h > >> > files just for that and duplicate it to bsd-user/$ARCH/target_elf.h > >> > >> We already have linux-user/$ARCH/target_cpu.h, which is exactly > >> for this kind of define. > > we don't have it for bsd-user though and it would be > > code duplication to add such. > > Using $ARCH/cpu.h seems to be a better fit for sharing > > default across liux/bsd-user. > > Yes, bsd-user is a bit unmaintained and behind linux-user in > its structuring. I don't mind bsd-user being a bit of a mess, > but I don't want problems in bsd-user to cause us to put code > where it shouldn't be in other parts of the codebase. (It's > not inherently the case that "best CPU choice for Linux user" > is the same as "best CPU choice for bsd-user" either.) Ok, if there isn't objections wrt above mentioned code duplication in *-user, I surely can implement it as far as I can remove cpu_model along with it. > > thanks > -- PMM