From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J . Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nfsd: store stat times in fill_pre_wcc() instead of inode times Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:03:34 -0500 Message-ID: <20180119220334.GA13700@fieldses.org> References: <1514992475-8142-1-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> <1514992475-8142-3-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> <1514994062.3458.14.camel@kernel.org> <1515005144.3458.42.camel@kernel.org> <1515072403.20282.16.camel@kernel.org> <20180104230513.GA19858@fieldses.org> <20180105153018.GB28246@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180105153018.GB28246@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Jeff Layton , Miklos Szeredi , overlayfs , linux-fsdevel List-Id: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:30:18AM -0500, J . Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 04:45:46PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > So can I assume you will be taking both patches through your tree? > > and add said comment to your future self? > > I'm OK with that (if Jeff is). > > > Since patches are independent of overlayfs work, it does not matter if they > > get merged before or after overlayfs work, just please let us know what you > > intend to do, because right now I posted patch 1/2 at the end of the > > overlayfs series for Miklos to take. > > I'd be fine with that or with Miklos taking either or both (feel free to > add an Acked-by: tag for me if you take that route). > > But I'll assume I'm taking them unless I hear otherwise. By the way, I just got back to this: committed to nfsd-next at git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git, with just one extra paragraph on #2's changelog. --b.