From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f200.google.com (mail-qk0-f200.google.com [209.85.220.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C256B0006 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 05:54:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-f200.google.com with SMTP id k188so6734787qkc.18 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:54:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.156.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q2si1900797qkq.13.2018.01.30.02.54.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:54:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0UAsTiu011630 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 05:54:57 -0500 Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.109]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ftnn4d0u3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 05:54:57 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:54:55 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:54:50 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] mm documentation References: <20180130105237.GB7201@rapoport-lnx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180130105237.GB7201@rapoport-lnx> Message-Id: <20180130105450.GC7201@rapoport-lnx> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org (forgot to CC linux-mm) On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:52:37PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hello, > > The mm kernel-doc documentation is not in a great shape. > > Some of the existing kernel-doc annotations were not reformatted during > transition from dockbook to sphix. Sometimes the parameter descriptions > do not match actual code. But aside these rather mechanical issues there > are several points it'd like to discuss: > > * Currently, only 14 files are linked to kernel-api.rst under "Memory > Management in Linux" section. We have more than hundred files only in mm. > Even the existing documentation is not generated when running "make > htmldocs" > * Do we want to keep "Memory Management in Linux" under kernel-api.rst or > maybe it's worth adding, say, mm.rst? > * What is the desired layout of the documentation, what sections we'd like > to have, how the documentation should be ordered? > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Mike. -- Sincerely yours, Mike. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org