All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Arun Easi <arun.easi@cavium.com>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
	Peter Rivera <peter.rivera@broadcom.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq/scsi-mq: support global tags & introduce force_blk_mq
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 20:23:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207122257.GA16633@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c934478-a9c1-2f66-83f2-982b85c4e6cc@suse.de>

On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 07:50:21AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> [ .. ]
> >>
> >> Could you share us your patch for enabling global_tags/MQ on
> > megaraid_sas
> >> so that I can reproduce your test?
> >>
> >>> See below perf top data. "bt_iter" is consuming 4 times more CPU.
> >>
> >> Could you share us what the IOPS/CPU utilization effect is after
> > applying the
> >> patch V2? And your test script?
> > Regarding CPU utilization, I need to test one more time. Currently system
> > is in used.
> > 
> > I run below fio test on total 24 SSDs expander attached.
> > 
> > numactl -N 1 fio jbod.fio --rw=randread --iodepth=64 --bs=4k
> > --ioengine=libaio --rw=randread
> > 
> > Performance dropped from 1.6 M IOPs to 770K IOPs.
> > 
> This is basically what we've seen with earlier iterations.

Hi Hannes,

As I mentioned in another mail[1], Kashyap's patch has a big issue, which
causes only reply queue 0 used.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=151793204014631&w=2

So could you guys run your performance test again after fixing the patch?


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-03  4:21 [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq/scsi-mq: support global tags & introduce force_blk_mq Ming Lei
2018-02-03  4:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: tags: define several fields of tags as pointer Ming Lei
2018-02-05  6:57   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-08 17:34   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-08 17:34     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-03  4:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS Ming Lei
2018-02-05  6:54   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-05 10:35     ` Ming Lei
2018-02-03  4:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: null_blk: introduce module parameter of 'g_global_tags' Ming Lei
2018-02-05  6:54   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-03  4:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] scsi: introduce force_blk_mq Ming Lei
2018-02-05  6:57   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-03  4:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: virtio_scsi: fix IO hang by irq vector automatic affinity Ming Lei
2018-02-05  6:57   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-05  6:58 ` [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq/scsi-mq: support global tags & introduce force_blk_mq Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-05  7:05   ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-05  7:05     ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-05 10:17     ` Ming Lei
2018-02-06  6:03       ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-06  8:04         ` Ming Lei
2018-02-06 11:29           ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-06 12:31             ` Ming Lei
2018-02-06 14:27               ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-06 15:46                 ` Ming Lei
2018-02-07  6:50                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-07 12:23                   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-02-07 14:14                     ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-08  1:23                       ` Ming Lei
2018-02-08  7:00                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-02-08 16:53                         ` Ming Lei
2018-02-09  4:58                           ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-09  5:31                             ` Ming Lei
2018-02-09  8:42                               ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-10  1:01                                 ` Ming Lei
2018-02-11  5:31                                   ` Ming Lei
2018-02-12 18:35                                     ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-13  0:40                                       ` Ming Lei
2018-02-14  6:28                                         ` Kashyap Desai
2018-02-05 10:23   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207122257.GA16633@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=arun.easi@cavium.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.rivera@broadcom.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.