From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F2E1F404 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753643AbeBGM4w (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:56:52 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:43512 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753478AbeBGM4v (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:56:51 -0500 Received: (qmail 6769 invoked by uid 109); 7 Feb 2018 12:56:52 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:56:52 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 29855 invoked by uid 111); 7 Feb 2018 12:57:33 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:57:33 -0500 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 07 Feb 2018 07:56:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 07:56:49 -0500 From: Jeff King To: pedro rijo Cc: Duy Nguyen , "Robert P. J. Day" , Git Mailing list Subject: Re: is http://git-scm.com an *official* git-affiliated site? Message-ID: <20180207125649.GA16018@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:34:51AM +0000, pedro rijo wrote: > The command list under https://git-scm.com/docs doesn't show all the > commands. It's a manually curated list as we can see at > > - https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/blob/master/app/views/doc/ref.html.erb > - https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/tree/master/app/views/shared/ref > > I'm not sure if the goal ever was to list all available commands or to just > list some important existing commands (cc @Peff). > > If we want to list all available commands, there's some work that must be > done in order to automate that, since it's not feasible to manually add > each new command. I think we _could_ just add all commands, but there's some value in organizing them. I'm not sure if there's enough information in git.git to do that organization. But we could also have a curated list of some subset of the commands, and then dump the rest in an alphabetized index. -Peff