All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen: Calculate __max_logical_packages on PV domains
Date: Wed,  7 Feb 2018 18:49:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207234923.13544-1-prarit@redhat.com> (raw)

The kernel panics on PV domains because native_smp_cpus_done() is
only called for HVM domains.

Calculate __max_logical_packages for PV domains.

Fixes: b4c0a7326f5d ("x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate")
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Tested-and-reported-by: Simon Gaiser <simon@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c  | 10 ++++++++--
 arch/x86/xen/smp.c         |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
index 461f53d27708..a4189762b266 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static inline void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
 void cpu_disable_common(void);
 void native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void);
 void native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus);
+void calculate_max_logical_packages(void);
 void native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus);
 void common_cpu_up(unsigned int cpunum, struct task_struct *tidle);
 int native_cpu_up(unsigned int cpunum, struct task_struct *tidle);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 6f27facbaa9b..767573b7f2db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1281,11 +1281,10 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
 	cpu_set_state_online(me);
 }
 
-void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
+void __init calculate_max_logical_packages(void)
 {
 	int ncpus;
 
-	pr_debug("Boot done\n");
 	/*
 	 * Today neither Intel nor AMD support heterogenous systems so
 	 * extrapolate the boot cpu's data to all packages.
@@ -1293,6 +1292,13 @@ void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
 	ncpus = cpu_data(0).booted_cores * topology_max_smt_threads();
 	__max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, ncpus);
 	pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
+}
+
+void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
+{
+	pr_debug("Boot done\n");
+
+	calculate_max_logical_packages();
 
 	if (x86_has_numa_in_package)
 		set_sched_topology(x86_numa_in_package_topology);
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
index 77c959cf81e7..7a43b2ae19f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ void __init xen_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
 
 	if (xen_hvm_domain())
 		native_smp_cpus_done(max_cpus);
+	else
+		calculate_max_logical_packages();
 
 	if (xen_have_vcpu_info_placement)
 		return;
-- 
2.15.0.rc0.39.g2f0e14e64

             reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07 23:49 Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2018-02-08  0:59 ` [PATCH] x86/xen: Calculate __max_logical_packages on PV domains Boris Ostrovsky
2018-02-08  0:59 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-02-08  8:49   ` Juergen Gross
2018-02-13 12:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-13 12:29       ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-08  8:49   ` Juergen Gross
2018-02-27 17:08   ` Simon Gaiser
2018-02-27 17:08   ` Simon Gaiser
2018-02-12 13:51 ` Juergen Gross
2018-02-12 13:51 ` Juergen Gross
2018-02-07 23:49 Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207234923.13544-1-prarit@redhat.com \
    --to=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.