From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934553AbeBLM3D (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:29:03 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:45088 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933001AbeBLM3B (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:29:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:28:52 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwmw@amazon.co.uk, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Borislav Petkov , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before calling into firmware Message-ID: <20180212122852.GH25235@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1518362359-1005-1-git-send-email-dwmw@amazon.co.uk> <20180212102211.cdrrqqd4hdw7xu5y@gmail.com> <20180212115002.GI25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180212115002.GI25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:50:02PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:22:11AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > +static inline void firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_start(void) > > > +{ > > > + alternative_msr_write(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, SPEC_CTRL_IBRS, > > > + X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW); > > > +} > > > + > > > +static inline void firmware_restrict_branch_speculation_end(void) > > > +{ > > > + alternative_msr_write(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0, > > > + X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW); > > > > BTW., there's a detail that only occurred to me today, this enabling/disabling > > sequence is not NMI safe, and it might be called from NMI context: > > Wait, we're doing firmware from NMI? That sounds like a _REALLY_ bad > idea. Argh, its that stupid watchdog driver again.. Not only does it call firmware, it also uses (!raw) spinlock.