From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] objtool: Add module specific retpoline rules
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:07:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212130732.GL25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518440480.6606.62.camel@infradead.org>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 01:01:20PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 13:48 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > David wanted to not use retpolines in .init.text but that will trip up
> > objtool retpoline validation, fix that.
>
> I wanted, I got. This is upstream already (66f793099a63) so this commit
> message possibly wants tweaking slightly.
Right you are, I should have re-read these Changelogs before posting ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 12:48 [PATCH v2 0/8] objtool: retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] objtool: Use existing global variables for options Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] objtool: Add retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] objtool: Add module specific retpoline rules Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 13:01 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-12 13:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-02-12 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] objtool: Retpoline validation tweaks Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:57 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-12 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] x86,nospec: Annotate indirect calls/jumps Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/paravirt: Annotate indirect calls Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] x86: Annotate indirect jump in head_64.S Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] x86,sme: Annotate indirect call Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180212130732.GL25181@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.