From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tipbuild@zytor.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti 19/20] arch/x86/entry/entry_64.o: warning: objtool: paranoid_entry()+0x11: call without frame pointer save/setup
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:13:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212131351.ezb34yvghc3eqhvu@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201802121926.YqVjXPha%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 07:33:27PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/pti
> head: 5a10e729bc0aa9420a23a70b169eadd229c27bc1
> commit: f09d160992d129b6d8fada7543761d40f5b33596 [19/20] x86/entry/64: Get rid of the ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK and SAVE_AND_CLEAR_REGS macros
> config: x86_64-randconfig-s0-02121550 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.4.0-9) 6.4.0 20171026
> reproduce:
> git checkout f09d160992d129b6d8fada7543761d40f5b33596
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.o: warning: objtool: paranoid_entry()+0x11: call without frame pointer save/setup
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Oops, looks like one of my suggested unwind hint changes wasn't so good
for the frame pointer case. The below should fix it. I'll submit a
proper patch in a little bit after running it through 0-day.
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index cfbf43366731..1c54204207d8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -1128,6 +1128,7 @@ idtentry machine_check do_mce has_error_code=0 paranoid=1
* Return: ebx=0: need swapgs on exit, ebx=1: otherwise
*/
ENTRY(paranoid_entry)
+ UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
cld
movl $1, %ebx
movl $MSR_GS_BASE, %ecx
@@ -1141,7 +1142,7 @@ ENTRY(paranoid_entry)
SAVE_AND_SWITCH_TO_KERNEL_CR3 scratch_reg=%rax save_reg=%r14
ret
-ENDPROC(paranoid_entry)
+END(paranoid_entry)
/*
* "Paranoid" exit path from exception stack. This is invoked
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 11:33 [tip:x86/pti 19/20] arch/x86/entry/entry_64.o: warning: objtool: paranoid_entry()+0x11: call without frame pointer save/setup kbuild test robot
2018-02-12 13:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-02-12 17:45 ` [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Fix paranoid_entry() frame pointer warning Josh Poimboeuf
2018-02-13 9:03 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180212131351.ezb34yvghc3eqhvu@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tipbuild@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.