From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.fireflyinternet.com ([109.228.58.192]:50220 "EHLO fireflyinternet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933638AbeBMJCA (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 04:02:00 -0500 From: Chris Wilson To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Chris Wilson , Tvrtko Ursulin , Joonas Lahtinen , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:01:54 +0000 Message-Id: <20180213090154.17373-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20180213073842.hb5mgh6i7jd2f6um@intel.com> References: <20180213073842.hb5mgh6i7jd2f6um@intel.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: When a request is preempted, it is unsubmitted from the HW queue and removed from the active list of breadcrumbs. In the process, this however triggers the signaler and it may see the clear rbtree with the old, and still valid, seqno, or it may match the cleared seqno with the now zero rq->global_seqno. This confuses the signaler into action and signaling the fence. Fixes: d6a2289d9d6b ("drm/i915: Remove the preempted request from the execution queue") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: # v4.12+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180206094633.30181-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit fd10e2ce9905030d922e179a8047a4d50daffd8e) --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 29 ++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c index bd40fea16b4f..f54ddda9fdad 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c @@ -594,29 +594,16 @@ void intel_engine_remove_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock); } -static bool signal_valid(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request) -{ - return intel_wait_check_request(&request->signaling.wait, request); -} - static bool signal_complete(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request) { if (!request) return false; - /* If another process served as the bottom-half it may have already - * signalled that this wait is already completed. - */ - if (intel_wait_complete(&request->signaling.wait)) - return signal_valid(request); - - /* Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the + /* + * Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the * seqno to be visible or if the GPU hung. */ - if (__i915_request_irq_complete(request)) - return true; - - return false; + return __i915_request_irq_complete(request); } static struct drm_i915_gem_request *to_signaler(struct rb_node *rb) @@ -659,9 +646,13 @@ static int intel_breadcrumbs_signaler(void *arg) request = i915_gem_request_get_rcu(request); rcu_read_unlock(); if (signal_complete(request)) { - local_bh_disable(); - dma_fence_signal(&request->fence); - local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */ + if (!test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, + &request->fence.flags)) { + local_bh_disable(); + dma_fence_signal(&request->fence); + GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request)); + local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */ + } spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock); -- 2.16.1