[RFC PATCH 0/3] Include linux trace docs to Sphinx TOC tree

[RFC PATCH 0/3] Include linux trace docs to Sphinx TOC tree

[changbin.du]

From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>

Hi All,
The linux tracers are so useful that I want to make the docs better. The kernel
now uses Sphinx to generate intelligent and beautiful documentation from
reStructuredText files. I converted two trace docs for your to preview.

http://docservice.askxiong.com/linux-kernel/trace/index.html

If this looks good then I will do reset rest docs for trace. Please give
feedbacks. Thank you!

Changbin Du (3):
  Documentation: add tracing to Sphinx TOC tree
  Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format
  Documentation: add ftrace-uses.rst to doc tree

 Documentation/index.rst                            |   1 +
 .../trace/{ftrace-design.txt => ftrace-design.rst} | 248 +++++++++++----------
 Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst                |  23 +-
 Documentation/trace/index.rst                      |   9 +
 4 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
 rename Documentation/trace/{ftrace-design.txt => ftrace-design.rst} (75%)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/index.rst

-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 1/3] Documentation: add tracing to Sphinx TOC tree

[changbin.du]

From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/index.rst       | 1 +
 Documentation/trace/index.rst | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/index.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/index.rst b/Documentation/index.rst
index ef5080c..3b99ab9 100644
--- a/Documentation/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/index.rst
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ merged much easier.
    dev-tools/index
    doc-guide/index
    kernel-hacking/index
+   trace/index
    maintainer/index
 
 Kernel API documentation
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/index.rst b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d986ead
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+==========================
+Linux Tracing Technologies
+==========================
+
+.. toctree::
+   :maxdepth: 2
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 2/3] Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format

[changbin.du]

From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
---
 .../trace/{ftrace-design.txt => ftrace-design.rst} | 248 +++++++++++----------
 Documentation/trace/index.rst                      |   2 +
 2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
 rename Documentation/trace/{ftrace-design.txt => ftrace-design.rst} (75%)

diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
similarity index 75%
rename from Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt
rename to Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
index a273dd0..0f32a85 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt
+++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
-		function tracer guts
-		====================
-		By Mike Frysinger
+======================
+Function Tracer Design
+======================
+
+:Author: Mike Frysinger
 
 Introduction
 ------------
@@ -21,8 +23,8 @@ Prerequisites
 -------------
 
 Ftrace relies on these features being implemented:
- STACKTRACE_SUPPORT - implement save_stack_trace()
- TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT - implement include/asm/irqflags.h
+  - STACKTRACE_SUPPORT - implement save_stack_trace()
+  - TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT - implement include/asm/irqflags.h
 
 
 HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
@@ -32,9 +34,11 @@ You will need to implement the mcount and the ftrace_stub functions.
 
 The exact mcount symbol name will depend on your toolchain.  Some call it
 "mcount", "_mcount", or even "__mcount".  You can probably figure it out by
-running something like:
+running something like::
+
 	$ echo 'main(){}' | gcc -x c -S -o - - -pg | grep mcount
 	        call    mcount
+
 We'll make the assumption below that the symbol is "mcount" just to keep things
 nice and simple in the examples.
 
@@ -56,8 +60,9 @@ size of the mcount call that is embedded in the function).
 
 For example, if the function foo() calls bar(), when the bar() function calls
 mcount(), the arguments mcount() will pass to the tracer are:
-	"frompc" - the address bar() will use to return to foo()
-	"selfpc" - the address bar() (with mcount() size adjustment)
+
+  - "frompc" - the address bar() will use to return to foo()
+  - "selfpc" - the address bar() (with mcount() size adjustment)
 
 Also keep in mind that this mcount function will be called *a lot*, so
 optimizing for the default case of no tracer will help the smooth running of
@@ -67,39 +72,41 @@ means the code flow should usually be kept linear (i.e. no branching in the nop
 case).  This is of course an optimization and not a hard requirement.
 
 Here is some pseudo code that should help (these functions should actually be
-implemented in assembly):
+implemented in assembly)::
 
-void ftrace_stub(void)
-{
-	return;
-}
+	void ftrace_stub(void)
+	{
+		return;
+	}
 
-void mcount(void)
-{
-	/* save any bare state needed in order to do initial checking */
+	void mcount(void)
+	{
+		/* save any bare state needed in order to do initial checking */
 
-	extern void (*ftrace_trace_function)(unsigned long, unsigned long);
-	if (ftrace_trace_function != ftrace_stub)
-		goto do_trace;
+		extern void (*ftrace_trace_function)(unsigned long, unsigned long);
+		if (ftrace_trace_function != ftrace_stub)
+			goto do_trace;
 
-	/* restore any bare state */
+		/* restore any bare state */
 
-	return;
+		return;
 
-do_trace:
+	do_trace:
 
-	/* save all state needed by the ABI (see paragraph above) */
+		/* save all state needed by the ABI (see paragraph above) */
 
-	unsigned long frompc = ...;
-	unsigned long selfpc = <return address> - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE;
-	ftrace_trace_function(frompc, selfpc);
+		unsigned long frompc = ...;
+		unsigned long selfpc = <return address> - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE;
+		ftrace_trace_function(frompc, selfpc);
 
-	/* restore all state needed by the ABI */
-}
+		/* restore all state needed by the ABI */
+	}
 
 Don't forget to export mcount for modules !
-extern void mcount(void);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mcount);
+::
+
+	extern void mcount(void);
+	EXPORT_SYMBOL(mcount);
 
 
 HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
@@ -127,38 +134,40 @@ That function will simply call the common ftrace_return_to_handler function and
 that will return the original return address with which you can return to the
 original call site.
 
-Here is the updated mcount pseudo code:
-void mcount(void)
-{
-...
-	if (ftrace_trace_function != ftrace_stub)
-		goto do_trace;
-
-+#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
-+	extern void (*ftrace_graph_return)(...);
-+	extern void (*ftrace_graph_entry)(...);
-+	if (ftrace_graph_return != ftrace_stub ||
-+	    ftrace_graph_entry != ftrace_graph_entry_stub)
-+		ftrace_graph_caller();
-+#endif
-
-	/* restore any bare state */
-...
-
-Here is the pseudo code for the new ftrace_graph_caller assembly function:
-#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
-void ftrace_graph_caller(void)
-{
-	/* save all state needed by the ABI */
-
-	unsigned long *frompc = &...;
-	unsigned long selfpc = <return address> - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE;
-	/* passing frame pointer up is optional -- see below */
-	prepare_ftrace_return(frompc, selfpc, frame_pointer);
-
-	/* restore all state needed by the ABI */
-}
-#endif
+Here is the updated mcount pseudo code::
+
+	void mcount(void)
+	{
+	...
+		if (ftrace_trace_function != ftrace_stub)
+			goto do_trace;
+
+	+#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+	+	extern void (*ftrace_graph_return)(...);
+	+	extern void (*ftrace_graph_entry)(...);
+	+	if (ftrace_graph_return != ftrace_stub ||
+	+	    ftrace_graph_entry != ftrace_graph_entry_stub)
+	+		ftrace_graph_caller();
+	+#endif
+
+		/* restore any bare state */
+	...
+
+Here is the pseudo code for the new ftrace_graph_caller assembly function::
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+	void ftrace_graph_caller(void)
+	{
+		/* save all state needed by the ABI */
+
+		unsigned long *frompc = &...;
+		unsigned long selfpc = <return address> - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE;
+		/* passing frame pointer up is optional -- see below */
+		prepare_ftrace_return(frompc, selfpc, frame_pointer);
+
+		/* restore all state needed by the ABI */
+	}
+	#endif
 
 For information on how to implement prepare_ftrace_return(), simply look at the
 x86 version (the frame pointer passing is optional; see the next section for
@@ -171,20 +180,21 @@ that the ABI that applies here is different from what applies to the mcount
 code.  Since you are returning from a function (after the epilogue), you might
 be able to skimp on things saved/restored (usually just registers used to pass
 return values).
+::
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
-void return_to_handler(void)
-{
-	/* save all state needed by the ABI (see paragraph above) */
+	#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+	void return_to_handler(void)
+	{
+		/* save all state needed by the ABI (see paragraph above) */
 
-	void (*original_return_point)(void) = ftrace_return_to_handler();
+		void (*original_return_point)(void) = ftrace_return_to_handler();
 
-	/* restore all state needed by the ABI */
+		/* restore all state needed by the ABI */
 
-	/* this is usually either a return or a jump */
-	original_return_point();
-}
-#endif
+		/* this is usually either a return or a jump */
+		original_return_point();
+	}
+	#endif
 
 
 HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
@@ -228,20 +238,20 @@ HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
 
 You need very few things to get the syscalls tracing in an arch.
 
-- Support HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK (see arch/Kconfig).
-- Have a NR_syscalls variable in <asm/unistd.h> that provides the number
-  of syscalls supported by the arch.
-- Support the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT thread flags.
-- Put the trace_sys_enter() and trace_sys_exit() tracepoints calls from ptrace
-  in the ptrace syscalls tracing path.
-- If the system call table on this arch is more complicated than a simple array
-  of addresses of the system calls, implement an arch_syscall_addr to return
-  the address of a given system call.
-- If the symbol names of the system calls do not match the function names on
-  this arch, define ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_MATCH_SYM_NAME in asm/ftrace.h and
-  implement arch_syscall_match_sym_name with the appropriate logic to return
-  true if the function name corresponds with the symbol name.
-- Tag this arch as HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS.
+  - Support HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK (see arch/Kconfig).
+  - Have a NR_syscalls variable in <asm/unistd.h> that provides the number
+    of syscalls supported by the arch.
+  - Support the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT thread flags.
+  - Put the trace_sys_enter() and trace_sys_exit() tracepoints calls from ptrace
+    in the ptrace syscalls tracing path.
+  - If the system call table on this arch is more complicated than a simple array
+    of addresses of the system calls, implement an arch_syscall_addr to return
+    the address of a given system call.
+  - If the symbol names of the system calls do not match the function names on
+    this arch, define ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_MATCH_SYM_NAME in asm/ftrace.h and
+    implement arch_syscall_match_sym_name with the appropriate logic to return
+    true if the function name corresponds with the symbol name.
+  - Tag this arch as HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS.
 
 
 HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
@@ -276,22 +286,28 @@ Once those are out of the way, you will need to implement:
 
 First you will need to fill out some arch details in your asm/ftrace.h.
 
-Define MCOUNT_ADDR as the address of your mcount symbol similar to:
+Define MCOUNT_ADDR as the address of your mcount symbol similar to::
+
 	#define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)mcount)
-Since no one else will have a decl for that function, you will need to:
+
+Since no one else will have a decl for that function, you will need to::
+
 	extern void mcount(void);
 
 You will also need the helper function ftrace_call_adjust().  Most people
-will be able to stub it out like so:
+will be able to stub it out like so::
+
 	static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
 	{
 		return addr;
 	}
+
 <details to be filled>
 
 Lastly you will need the custom dyn_arch_ftrace structure.  If you need
 some extra state when runtime patching arbitrary call sites, this is the
-place.  For now though, create an empty struct:
+place.  For now though, create an empty struct::
+
 	struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
 		/* No extra data needed */
 	};
@@ -306,28 +322,28 @@ easier to have two separate definitions split up by #ifdefs.  Same goes for
 the ftrace_stub() as that will now be inlined in ftrace_caller().
 
 Before we get confused anymore, let's check out some pseudo code so you can
-implement your own stuff in assembly:
+implement your own stuff in assembly::
 
-void mcount(void)
-{
-	return;
-}
+	void mcount(void)
+	{
+		return;
+	}
 
-void ftrace_caller(void)
-{
-	/* save all state needed by the ABI (see paragraph above) */
+	void ftrace_caller(void)
+	{
+		/* save all state needed by the ABI (see paragraph above) */
 
-	unsigned long frompc = ...;
-	unsigned long selfpc = <return address> - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE;
+		unsigned long frompc = ...;
+		unsigned long selfpc = <return address> - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE;
 
-ftrace_call:
-	ftrace_stub(frompc, selfpc);
+	ftrace_call:
+		ftrace_stub(frompc, selfpc);
 
-	/* restore all state needed by the ABI */
+		/* restore all state needed by the ABI */
 
-ftrace_stub:
-	return;
-}
+	ftrace_stub:
+		return;
+	}
 
 This might look a little odd at first, but keep in mind that we will be runtime
 patching multiple things.  First, only functions that we actually want to trace
@@ -341,21 +357,23 @@ order to make it through the next section.
 
 Every arch has an init callback function.  If you need to do something early on
 to initialize some state, this is the time to do that.  Otherwise, this simple
-function below should be sufficient for most people:
+function below should be sufficient for most people::
 
-int __init ftrace_dyn_arch_init(void)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
+	int __init ftrace_dyn_arch_init(void)
+	{
+		return 0;
+	}
 
 There are two functions that are used to do runtime patching of arbitrary
 functions.  The first is used to turn the mcount call site into a nop (which
 is what helps us retain runtime performance when not tracing).  The second is
 used to turn the mcount call site into a call to an arbitrary location (but
 typically that is ftracer_caller()).  See the general function definition in
-linux/ftrace.h for the functions:
+linux/ftrace.h for the functions::
+
 	ftrace_make_nop()
 	ftrace_make_call()
+
 The rec->ip value is the address of the mcount call site that was collected
 by the scripts/recordmcount.pl during build time.
 
@@ -364,7 +382,8 @@ will be modifying the assembly code at the location of the ftrace_call symbol
 inside of the ftrace_caller() function.  So you should have sufficient padding
 at that location to support the new function calls you'll be inserting.  Some
 people will be using a "call" type instruction while others will be using a
-"branch" type instruction.  Specifically, the function is:
+"branch" type instruction.  Specifically, the function is::
+
 	ftrace_update_ftrace_func()
 
 
@@ -373,6 +392,7 @@ HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE + HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
 
 The function grapher needs a few tweaks in order to work with dynamic ftrace.
 Basically, you will need to:
+
 	- update:
 		- ftrace_caller()
 		- ftrace_graph_call()
@@ -382,7 +402,9 @@ Basically, you will need to:
 		- ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller()
 
 <details to be filled>
+
 Quick notes:
+
 	- add a nop stub after the ftrace_call location named ftrace_graph_call;
 	  stub needs to be large enough to support a call to ftrace_graph_caller()
 	- update ftrace_graph_caller() to work with being called by the new
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/index.rst b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
index d986ead..c8000ba 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
@@ -4,3 +4,5 @@ Linux Tracing Technologies
 
 .. toctree::
    :maxdepth: 2
+
+   ftrace-design
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 3/3] Documentation: add ftrace-uses.rst to doc tree

[changbin.du]

From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
 Documentation/trace/index.rst       |  1 +
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst
index 3aed560..998a60a 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst
@@ -21,13 +21,14 @@ how to use ftrace to implement your own function callbacks.
 
 The ftrace context
 ==================
+.. warning::
 
-WARNING: The ability to add a callback to almost any function within the
-kernel comes with risks. A callback can be called from any context
-(normal, softirq, irq, and NMI). Callbacks can also be called just before
-going to idle, during CPU bring up and takedown, or going to user space.
-This requires extra care to what can be done inside a callback. A callback
-can be called outside the protective scope of RCU.
+  The ability to add a callback to almost any function within the
+  kernel comes with risks. A callback can be called from any context
+  (normal, softirq, irq, and NMI). Callbacks can also be called just before
+  going to idle, during CPU bring up and takedown, or going to user space.
+  This requires extra care to what can be done inside a callback. A callback
+  can be called outside the protective scope of RCU.
 
 The ftrace infrastructure has some protections agains recursions and RCU
 but one must still be very careful how they use the callbacks.
@@ -54,15 +55,15 @@ an ftrace_ops with ftrace:
 
 Both .flags and .private are optional. Only .func is required.
 
-To enable tracing call::
+To enable tracing call:
 
 .. c:function::  register_ftrace_function(&ops);
 
-To disable tracing call::
+To disable tracing call:
 
 .. c:function::  unregister_ftrace_function(&ops);
 
-The above is defined by including the header::
+The above is defined by including the header:
 
 .. c:function:: #include <linux/ftrace.h>
 
@@ -200,7 +201,7 @@ match a specific pattern.
 
 See Filter Commands in :file:`Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt`.
 
-To just trace the schedule function::
+To just trace the schedule function:
 
 .. code-block:: c
 
@@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ To add more functions, call the ftrace_set_filter() more than once with the
 @reset parameter set to zero. To remove the current filter set and replace it
 with new functions defined by @buf, have @reset be non-zero.
 
-To remove all the filtered functions and trace all functions::
+To remove all the filtered functions and trace all functions:
 
 .. code-block:: c
 
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/index.rst b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
index c8000ba..aa2baad 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/index.rst
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ Linux Tracing Technologies
    :maxdepth: 2
 
    ftrace-design
+   ftrace-uses
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:12:18 +0800
changbin.du@intel.com wrote:

> From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../trace/{ftrace-design.txt => ftrace-design.rst} | 248 +++++++++++----------
>  Documentation/trace/index.rst                      |   2 +
>  2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
>  rename Documentation/trace/{ftrace-design.txt => ftrace-design.rst} (75%)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
> similarity index 75%
> rename from Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt
> rename to Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
> index a273dd0..0f32a85 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> -		function tracer guts
> -		====================
> -		By Mike Frysinger
> +======================
> +Function Tracer Design
> +======================
> +
> +:Author: Mike Frysinger
>  

This document is out of date, and I rather have it updated before we
make it more "available" elsewhere.

-- Steve

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format

[Du, Changbin]

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:57:05PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:12:18 +0800
> changbin.du@intel.com wrote:
> 
> > From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  .../trace/{ftrace-design.txt => ftrace-design.rst} | 248 +++++++++++----------
> >  Documentation/trace/index.rst                      |   2 +
> >  2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
> >  rename Documentation/trace/{ftrace-design.txt => ftrace-design.rst} (75%)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
> > similarity index 75%
> > rename from Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt
> > rename to Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
> > index a273dd0..0f32a85 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst
> > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> > -		function tracer guts
> > -		====================
> > -		By Mike Frysinger
> > +======================
> > +Function Tracer Design
> > +======================
> > +
> > +:Author: Mike Frysinger
> >  
> 
> This document is out of date, and I rather have it updated before we
> make it more "available" elsewhere.
>
Got you. I plan to convert below docs. Are they out of date, too?

events-msr.txt, events.txt, mmiotrace.txt, stm.txt, uprobetracer.txt
events-nmi.txt, intel_th.txt, tracepoint-analysis.txt, events-kmem.txt,
events-power.txt, ftrace.txt, hwlat_detector.txt, kprobetrace.txt,
tracepoints.txt.
 
> -- Steve

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:57:05 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> This document is out of date, and I rather have it updated before we
> make it more "available" elsewhere.

Imagine that, an out-of-date doc in the kernel :)

Seriously, though, I'd argue that (1) it's already highly available, and
(2) it's useful now.  And (3) who knows when that update will happen?
Unless we have reason to believe that a new version is waiting on the
wings, I don't really see why we would want to delay this work.

Thanks,

jon

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:07:26 +0800
"Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com> wrote:


> > This document is out of date, and I rather have it updated before we
> > make it more "available" elsewhere.
> >  
> Got you. I plan to convert below docs. Are they out of date, too?
> 
> events-msr.txt, events.txt, mmiotrace.txt, stm.txt, uprobetracer.txt
> events-nmi.txt, intel_th.txt, tracepoint-analysis.txt, events-kmem.txt,
> events-power.txt, ftrace.txt, hwlat_detector.txt, kprobetrace.txt,
> tracepoints.txt.

I'm sure some of them are. I don't have time now to investigate which
ones though.

-- Steve

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:49:52 -0700
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:57:05 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > This document is out of date, and I rather have it updated before we
> > make it more "available" elsewhere.  
> 
> Imagine that, an out-of-date doc in the kernel :)
> 
> Seriously, though, I'd argue that (1) it's already highly available, and
> (2) it's useful now.  And (3) who knows when that update will happen?
> Unless we have reason to believe that a new version is waiting on the
> wings, I don't really see why we would want to delay this work.

Actually, some of these documents I was thinking of labeling as
"obsolete" or simply removing them. The ftrace-design one is about
how to port ftrace to other architectures, and I already had to correct
people that based their work on it.

Yeah, I really need to get some time to update them, but like everyone
else, that's just the 90th thing I have to do.

-- Steve

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format

[Du, Changbin]

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:36:29PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:49:52 -0700
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:57:05 -0500
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > This document is out of date, and I rather have it updated before we
> > > make it more "available" elsewhere.  
> > 
> > Imagine that, an out-of-date doc in the kernel :)
> > 
> > Seriously, though, I'd argue that (1) it's already highly available, and
> > (2) it's useful now.  And (3) who knows when that update will happen?
> > Unless we have reason to believe that a new version is waiting on the
> > wings, I don't really see why we would want to delay this work.
> 
> Actually, some of these documents I was thinking of labeling as
> "obsolete" or simply removing them. The ftrace-design one is about
> how to port ftrace to other architectures, and I already had to correct
> people that based their work on it.
> 
> Yeah, I really need to get some time to update them, but like everyone
> else, that's just the 90th thing I have to do.
> 
> -- Steve
Reading this doc, I think most of information are still useful for undertading the
implemeation. So how abount just put a caution at the begining of doc as below 
defore get updated?
http://docservice.askxiong.com/linux-kernel/trace/ftrace-design.html

Anyway, I just converted them all. I will send them out. Please comemnt if some
of them should be removed. 

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du