From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enmC5-00068N-Um for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:13:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enmC2-0003b0-He for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:13:25 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:54902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enmC2-0003aU-90 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:13:22 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1JEBXXo147441 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:13:21 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.149]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2g7wmrpnwt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:13:16 -0500 Received: from localhost by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:13:15 -0700 From: Daniel Henrique Barboza Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:12:58 -0300 In-Reply-To: <20180219141259.26526-1-danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180219141259.26526-1-danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20180219141259.26526-2-danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] qmp: adding 'wakeup-suspend-support' in query-target List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: armbru@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Daniel Henrique Barboza When issuing the qmp/hmp 'system_wakeup' command, what happens in a nutshell is: - qmp_system_wakeup_request set runstate to RUNNING, sets a wakeup_reason and notify the event - in the main_loop, all vcpus are paused, a system reset is issued, all subscribers of wakeup_notifiers receives a notification, vcpus are then resumed and the wake up QAPI event is fired Note that this procedure alone doesn't ensure that the guest will awake from SUSPENDED state - the subscribers of the wake up event must take action to resume the guest, otherwise the guest will simply reboot. At this moment there are only two subscribers of the wake up event: one in hw/acpi/core.c and another one in hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c. This means that system_wakeup does not work as intended with other architectures. However, only the presence of 'system_wakeup' is required for QGA to support 'guest-suspend-ram' and 'guest-suspend-hybrid' at this moment. This means that the user/management will expect to suspend the guest using one of those suspend commands and then resume execution using system_wakeup, regardless of the support offered in system_wakeup in the first place. This patch adds a new flag called 'wakeup-suspend-support' in TargetInfo that allows the caller to query if the guest supports wake up from suspend via system_wakeup. It goes over the subscribers of the wake up event and, if it's empty, it assumes that the guest does not support wake up from suspend (and thus, pm-suspend itself). This is the expected output of query-target when running a x86 guest: {"execute" : "query-target"} {"return": {"arch": "x86_64", "wakeup-suspend-support": true}} This is the output when running a pseries guest: {"execute" : "query-target"} {"return": {"arch": "ppc64", "wakeup-suspend-support": false}} Given that the TargetInfo structure is read-only, adding a new flag to it is backwards compatible. There is no need to deprecate the old TargetInfo format. With this extra tool, management can avoid situations where a guest that does not have proper suspend/wake capabilities ends up in inconsistent state (e.g. https://github.com/open-power-host-os/qemu/issues/31). Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza --- arch_init.c | 1 + include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 1 + qapi-schema.json | 4 +++- vl.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch_init.c b/arch_init.c index 4c36f2b076..72846866cf 100644 --- a/arch_init.c +++ b/arch_init.c @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ TargetInfo *qmp_query_target(Error **errp) TargetInfo *info = g_malloc0(sizeof(*info)); info->arch = g_strdup(TARGET_NAME); + info->wakeup_suspend_support = !qemu_wakeup_notifier_is_empty(); return info; } diff --git a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h index 77bb3da582..7620220a4b 100644 --- a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h +++ b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ typedef enum WakeupReason { void qemu_system_reset_request(ShutdownCause reason); void qemu_system_suspend_request(void); void qemu_register_suspend_notifier(Notifier *notifier); +bool qemu_wakeup_notifier_is_empty(void); void qemu_system_wakeup_request(WakeupReason reason); void qemu_system_wakeup_enable(WakeupReason reason, bool enabled); void qemu_register_wakeup_notifier(Notifier *notifier); diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json index 0262b9f20b..939af3b76f 100644 --- a/qapi-schema.json +++ b/qapi-schema.json @@ -2388,11 +2388,13 @@ # Information describing the QEMU target. # # @arch: the target architecture (eg "x86_64", "i386", etc) +# @wakeup-suspend-support: true if the target supports wake up from +# suspend (since 2.12) # # Since: 1.2.0 ## { 'struct': 'TargetInfo', - 'data': { 'arch': 'str' } } + 'data': { 'arch': 'str', 'wakeup-suspend-support': 'bool' } } ## # @query-target: diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c index 81724f5f17..d9f197d85e 100644 --- a/vl.c +++ b/vl.c @@ -1825,11 +1825,32 @@ void qemu_system_wakeup_enable(WakeupReason reason, bool enabled) } } +/* The existence of a wake-up notifier is being checked in the function + * qemu_wakeup_notifier_is_empty and it's used in the logic of the + * wakeup-suspend-support flag of QMP 'query-target' command. The idea + * of this flag is to indicate whether the guest supports wake-up from + * suspend (via system_wakeup QMP/HMP call for example), warning the user + * that the guest can't handle both wake-up from suspend and the suspend + * itself via QGA guest-suspend-ram and guest-suspend-hybrid (if it + * can't wake up, it can't be suspended safely). + * + * An assumption is made by the wakeup-suspend-support flag that only the + * guests that can go to RUN_STATE_SUSPENDED and wake up properly would + * be interested in this wakeup_notifier. Adding a wakeup_notifier for + * any other reason will break the logic of the wakeup-suspend-support + * flag and can lead to user/management confusion about the suspend/wake-up + * support of the guest. + */ void qemu_register_wakeup_notifier(Notifier *notifier) { notifier_list_add(&wakeup_notifiers, notifier); } +bool qemu_wakeup_notifier_is_empty(void) +{ + return QLIST_EMPTY(&wakeup_notifiers.notifiers); +} + void qemu_system_killed(int signal, pid_t pid) { shutdown_signal = signal; -- 2.14.3