All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Fix sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:18:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180221201839.GK30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f55f25f6-559d-bb93-5605-af66678438c2@amd.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 01:59:55PM -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:

> Sure, checking access_ok() does not guarantee that later
> copy_from_user() will not fail. But it does eliminate one possible
> reason for the failure. We are trying to validate most of the user
> inputs before we invoke  SEV command.

That makes no sense whatsoever.  If user is deliberately fuzzing
your code or trying to DoS it, that "validation" doesn't buy you
anything - they can just as well feed you NULL, after all.

What is the rationale for that?  "Userland is accidentally feeding
us garbage pointers" is the case where slowness is the least of your
concerns...

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-21 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-19 16:12 [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Fix sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) Brijesh Singh
2018-02-21 17:49 ` Al Viro
2018-02-21 19:59   ` Brijesh Singh
2018-02-21 20:18     ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-02-22 15:56       ` Brijesh Singh
2018-02-23 18:05         ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-23 18:26           ` Brijesh Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180221201839.GK30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.