From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([146.0.238.67]:45156 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752537AbeBVKGq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 05:06:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:03:10 +0100 From: Florian Westphal To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Paolo Abeni , David Miller , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, netdev , Florian Westphal Subject: Re: syzcaller patch postings... Message-ID: <20180222100310.GD24858@breakpoint.cc> References: <20180221.164732.52123327250032598.davem@davemloft.net> <1519288016.2583.4.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> I have to mention this now before it gets out of control. > >> > >> I would like to ask that syzkaller stop posting the patch it is > >> testing when it posts to netdev. > > > > There is an open issue on this topic: > > > > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/526 > > > > The current behaviour is that syzbot replies to all get_maintainer.pl > > recipients after testing a patch, regardless of the test submission > > recipient list, the idea was instead to respect such list. > > > Hi David, Florian, Paolo, > > Didn't realize it triggers patchwork. This wasn't intentional, sorry. > > Do I understand it correctly that if syzbot replies to the CC list > that was in the testing request, it will resolve the problem? So if > netdev wasn't in CC, it will not be added to CC. Yes, thats at least my expected/desired behaviour. This way I can even CC some other person (maintainer, reporter etc) to have them informed about test result too. > I will go and fix it now. Thank you Dmitry!