From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wbx@uclibc-ng.org (Waldemar Brodkorb) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:50:39 +0100 Subject: uClibc-ng testsuite failures In-Reply-To: <4aa73094-21c0-99a4-6d00-76d8c63c16c7@synopsys.com> References: <20180226005009.GR12535@waldemar-brodkorb.de> <1519647108.3740.8.camel@synopsys.com> <20180226195907.GU12535@waldemar-brodkorb.de> <4aa73094-21c0-99a4-6d00-76d8c63c16c7@synopsys.com> List-ID: Message-ID: <20180226205038.GV12535@waldemar-brodkorb.de> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, > On 02/26/2018 11:59 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > >>>The syscall cancellation failures are still there with gcc 7.3.0 and > >>>binutils 2.30. Do you have any patches on top of it? > >>Are you talking about these results? > >>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__downloads.uclibc-2Dng.org_reports_1.0.28_REPORT.arcv2.libc.uClibc-2Dng-2D1.0.28&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=7FgpX6o3vAhwMrMhLh-4ZJey5kjdNUwOL2CWsFwR4T8&m=TsxZS2Izf4LUrQfQCh9Iw8-L0zYXeJLdRhvUfyiWw2A&s=BGT84AxTG_-ymRw4CytOO7g6kTy7PXKYBrHbGF_pTR4&e= > >No. > >>But the link above points to stuff built with gcc 7.2 but not 7.3. > >>Could you please share your results with gcc 7.2 and binutils 2.30? > >Here with gcc 7.3.0 and binutils 2.30: > >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__downloads.uclibc-2Dng.org_reports_git_&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=7FgpX6o3vAhwMrMhLh-4ZJey5kjdNUwOL2CWsFwR4T8&m=TsxZS2Izf4LUrQfQCh9Iw8-L0zYXeJLdRhvUfyiWw2A&s=Ni7_rqZq4c0mvnYsOyvZoZEIddMnIOEsSmopG9m9LwU&e= > > I ran into similar issues with glibc test suite. It seems gcc 7.x released > won't cut it - it misses tons of upstream patches including > > 2017-11-03 e892f4fac605 [ARC] Fix to unwinding. > > So your best bet is to use upstream gcc master ! gcc 7 branch or gcc 8 latest greatest? Last time there was some issue with gcc8 and you told me to use gcc7 with some patches. /me is confused. best regards Waldemar