From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751962AbeCDQhA (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:37:00 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53312 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751893AbeCDQg5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:36:57 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 17:36:53 +0100 From: Michal =?UTF-8?B?U3VjaMOhbmVr?= To: Stefan Wahren Cc: Eric Anholt , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Florian Fainelli , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Phil Elwell , Gerd Hoffmann , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson , Julia Lawall , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stefan Schake Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: bcm2835: reset host on timeout Message-ID: <20180304173653.78adac53@naga.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <166274019.307112.1520085525833@email.1und1.de> References: <97593d6e1a41af1baff61f7d9e6e68a450fc9da6.1518619058.git.msuchanek@suse.de> <1fbf0d77-cb53-f0fa-b810-e9954138d907@i2se.com> <20180214163649.3a0c9476@kitsune.suse.cz> <20180214165827.386b9bb1@kitsune.suse.cz> <20180214202454.6e7ebeaf@naga.suse.cz> <166274019.307112.1520085525833@email.1und1.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 14:58:45 +0100 (CET) Stefan Wahren wrote: > In a github issue, i've read that badblocks could reproduce the issue > more likely. How many iterations of badblocks? It doe snot reproduce the issue for me. Thanks Michal From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: msuchanek@suse.de (Michal =?UTF-8?B?U3VjaMOhbmVr?=) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 17:36:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: bcm2835: reset host on timeout In-Reply-To: <166274019.307112.1520085525833@email.1und1.de> References: <97593d6e1a41af1baff61f7d9e6e68a450fc9da6.1518619058.git.msuchanek@suse.de> <1fbf0d77-cb53-f0fa-b810-e9954138d907@i2se.com> <20180214163649.3a0c9476@kitsune.suse.cz> <20180214165827.386b9bb1@kitsune.suse.cz> <20180214202454.6e7ebeaf@naga.suse.cz> <166274019.307112.1520085525833@email.1und1.de> Message-ID: <20180304173653.78adac53@naga.suse.cz> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 14:58:45 +0100 (CET) Stefan Wahren wrote: > In a github issue, i've read that badblocks could reproduce the issue > more likely. How many iterations of badblocks? It doe snot reproduce the issue for me. Thanks Michal