All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the Code: section
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 15:16:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180307141647.GI23662@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180307132535.g7c2jro5n7okavbh@treble>

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:25:35AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> How about we just remove the 'code_bytes=' option?

Haha, removing stuff is my usual solution :-)

I'd love to.

> (Or at the very
> least, reduce its possible range to a reasonable max?)
> 
> I doubt anybody actually uses it.  I'd never heard of it before, nor
> have I ever seen an oops with a long code dump.  I can't fathom why
> somebody would even need it.  64 bytes is plenty, and an 8k code dump
> just sounds insane.

Yeah, I see a Chuck Ebbert in git log output with a gmail account, maybe
that's the same person. (I've assumed he's not at RH anymore, otherwise
you would've CCed him :-)).

Let's ask him. CCed.

> It comes from the following commit:
> 
> commit 86c418374223be3f328b5522545196db02c8ceda
> Author: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
> Date:   Tue Feb 13 13:26:25 2007 +0100
> 
>     [PATCH] i386: add option to show more code in oops reports
> 
>     Sometimes developers need to see more object code in an oops report,
>     e.g. when kernel may be corrupted at runtime.
> 
>     Add the "code_bytes" option for this.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
>     Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
>     Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> 
> But I've never seen a case where somebody needed to use it.
> 
> -- 
> Josh

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-07 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-06  9:49 [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v1 Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 1/9] panic: Add closing panic marker parenthesis Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 11:03   ` [tip:core/core] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/fault: Do not print IP in show_fault_oops() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 11:09   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/dumpstack: Unify show_regs() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 11:10   ` [tip:x86/cleanups] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/dumpstack: Carve out Code: dumping into a function Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the Code: section Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06 18:47   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-07 10:13     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-07 13:25       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-07 14:16         ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-03-07 21:08         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-08 10:16           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 18:00             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-08 22:36               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-08 23:20                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-09 10:15                   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/dumpstack: Add loglevel argument to show_opcodes() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/fault: Dump user opcode bytes on fatal faults Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Add a show_ip() function Borislav Petkov
2018-03-06  9:49 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180307141647.GI23662@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.