On 12/03/18 - 22:04:59, Alexander Frömmgen wrote:
> Hi
> 
> > How do you plan to handle schedulers? Given the good experimental results
> of the min-RTT-first scheduler, will that be the only option? Or will it
> remain as a kernel module due to the time-sensitive nature of scheduling?
> 
> We experimented with a programmable scheduler in the Kernel, which enables
> timely scheduling decisions and a lot of flexibility. Details are available
> at https://progmp.net and you might want to directly test a scheduler at
> http://progmp.net/progmp.html 
> 
> Our current setup contains a lot of additional logic in the Kernel (e.g.,
> lexer, parser). While this has some benefits, I think that the eBPF-based
> part of our work should be sufficient  for most application scenarios.

I would love to see a patch-submission :-)


Cheers,
Christoph