From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] cgroup: Allow registration and lookup of cgroup private data
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:50:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180313205035.GN2943022@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180306234700.6562-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Hello, Matt.
cc'ing Roman and Alexei.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:46:55PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> There are cases where other parts of the kernel may wish to store data
> associated with individual cgroups without building a full cgroup
> controller. Let's add interfaces to allow them to register and lookup
> this private data for individual cgroups.
>
> A kernel system (e.g., a driver) that wishes to register private data
> for a cgroup will do so by subclassing the 'struct cgroup_priv'
> structure to describe the necessary data to store. Before registering a
> private data structure to a cgroup, the caller should fill in the 'key'
> and 'free' fields of the base cgroup_priv structure.
>
> * 'key' should be a unique void* that will act as a key for future
> privdata lookups/removals. Note that this allows drivers to store
> per-device private data for a cgroup by using a device pointer as a key.
>
> * 'free' should be a function pointer to a function that may be used
> to destroy the private data. This function will be called
> automatically if the underlying cgroup is destroyed.
This feature turned out to have more users than I originally
anticipated and bpf also wants something like this to track network
states. The requirements are pretty similar but not quite the same.
The extra requirements are...
* Lookup must be really cheap. Probably using pointer hash or walking
list isn't great, so maybe idr based lookup + RCU protected index
table per cgroup?
* It should support both regular memory and percpu pointers. Given
that what cgroup does is pretty much cgroup:key -> pointer lookup,
it's mostly about getting the interface right so that it's not too
error-prone.
Sorry about moving the goalpost.
Thanks.
--
tejun
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-13 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 23:46 [PATCH v3 0/6] DRM/i915 cgroup integration Matt Roper
2018-03-06 23:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] cgroup: Allow registration and lookup of cgroup private data Matt Roper
2018-03-13 20:50 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-03-13 21:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-03-13 21:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-13 21:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-03-13 22:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-13 22:13 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-13 22:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-03-13 22:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-06 23:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] cgroup: Introduce task_get_dfl_cgroup() Matt Roper
2018-03-13 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 23:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] cgroup: Introduce cgroup_permission() Matt Roper
2018-03-13 20:43 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 23:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/i915: cgroup integration (v2) Matt Roper
2018-03-06 23:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/i915: Introduce 'priority offset' for GPU contexts (v2) Matt Roper
2018-03-08 11:32 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-08 13:11 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-08 18:22 ` Matt Roper
2018-03-08 18:48 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-08 18:55 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-08 19:31 ` Matt Roper
2018-03-06 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915: Add context priority & priority offset to debugfs (v2) Matt Roper
2018-03-06 23:49 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tools: Introduce intel_cgroup tool Matt Roper
2018-03-06 23:49 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests: Introduce drv_cgroup Matt Roper
2018-03-06 23:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for DRM/i915 cgroup integration Patchwork
2018-03-07 0:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-03-07 5:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180313205035.GN2943022@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.