From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Cyrus-Session-Id: sloti22d1t05-1542408-1521028215-2-14066357232297741008 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 3.0 X-Spam-known-sender: no X-Spam-score: 0.0 X-Spam-hits: BAYES_00 -1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3, SPF_PASS -0.001, LANGUAGES en, BAYES_USED global, SA_VERSION 3.4.0 X-Spam-source: IP='140.211.166.137', Host='smtp4.osuosl.org', Country='US', FromHeader='com', MailFrom='org' X-Spam-charsets: plain='us-ascii' X-Resolved-to: greg@kroah.com X-Delivered-to: greg@kroah.com X-Mail-from: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=messagingengine.com; s=arctest; t=1521028215; b=aNbsPguAapmWGvTahV3o3VIvQr6glr53oi7umHVoYwl52wo 2wn46SQUZ0/DgZLoHXH+FkPB3R4iARh6TossbNWiiCDwCrbZHMc2qy94pcN6hJIh W0Kmt3azyddutzyqhpDIPQlCS+pRwh3jttag0W571Qqayw/bRM37CSGDCvlpzjPf LX1YL6W9CaDjoD78HA2QSue6i4oYNgGU9Em22e9w0h5c9FHGDpvl1i+jLYa7SKy7 5+W1W/08g/c1xKTD6IpK5/ygQkLVQEVLz9FD/Fu1X9u80NKkeBDKA1DWRAXrqAtr xR9qSZhqL/liCLbHNtWvusyhPuVbbW5x16cA9dA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:in-reply-to:list-id:list-unsubscribe :list-archive:list-post:list-help:list-subscribe:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:sender; s=arctest; t=1521028215; bh=O 5/Ca1SBf5uy9jBeETJL6WjmOzHcnnM/W+odpybjTQQ=; b=IphR+y9h3az8Doh6h QBxvwFS/FQPMo80tpjo6af8svEBW1PX98nDEjJS9GNu8P4SyN+deu5dxGhlkBKp/ ZUAyLhj1dneKHULVLZllgF9zUOAGHV9UhuKl53QH0dzMMJjsIkNBb24mw1JgmAyZ Si78K1uZw+RItXqvFwBCyLXVRxtWsevLdbuKbbc+UTMPiwP4Xcc59nTD1dc5NrLW +gqRJxwDyJAHQ+FH+IfYxru8MAfwx5kg8skYMpZI/K2hhPHoU2CezVfXE5fVRctq F3HnMWNqXb7foi9CRvfIcc+IPmZSMyx21e3TEOqFBnYAMBLYXd3tlwrk9LFTwXcH ZPZ8g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx2.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=none (no signatures found); dmarc=none (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=arm.com; iprev=pass policy.iprev=140.211.166.137 (smtp4.osuosl.org); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org smtp.helo=fraxinus.osuosl.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-category=clean score=-100 state=0; x-ptr=fail x-ptr-helo=fraxinus.osuosl.org x-ptr-lookup=smtp4.osuosl.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=linuxdriverproject.org smtp.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=yes header.domain=arm.com header.result=pass header_is_org_domain=yes; x-tls=pass version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128 Authentication-Results: mx2.messagingengine.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=none (no signatures found); dmarc=none (p=none,has-list-id=yes,d=none) header.from=arm.com; iprev=pass policy.iprev=140.211.166.137 (smtp4.osuosl.org); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org smtp.helo=fraxinus.osuosl.org; x-aligned-from=fail; x-category=clean score=-100 state=0; x-ptr=fail x-ptr-helo=fraxinus.osuosl.org x-ptr-lookup=smtp4.osuosl.org; x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=linuxdriverproject.org smtp.result=pass smtp_is_org_domain=yes header.domain=arm.com header.result=pass header_is_org_domain=yes; x-tls=pass version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128 X-Remote-Delivered-To: driverdev-devel@osuosl.org Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:50:00 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Dexuan Cui Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] PCI: hv: fix 2 hang issues in hv_compose_msi_msg() Message-ID: <20180314115000.GC27868@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180306182128.23281-1-decui@microsoft.com> <20180306182128.23281-7-decui@microsoft.com> <20180307123441.GD15139@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "'olaf@aepfle.de'" , Stephen Hemminger , "'linux-pci@vger.kernel.org'" , "'jasowang@redhat.com'" , "'driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'stable@vger.kernel.org'" , 'Jack Morgenstein' , "Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" , "'apw@canonical.com'" , "'marcelo.cerri@canonical.com'" , "'bhelgaas@google.com'" , "'vkuznets@redhat.com'" , Haiyang Zhang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:23:39PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote: [...] > Hi Lorenzo, Bjorn, and all, > Do you need more ACKs? Currently Michael and Haiyang reviewed and ack'd > the patchset. > > Should I send a v4 that just removes the "CC: stable@vger.kernel.org" tag > for patches 1, 2, 4 and 5? I tend to avoid a v4 as I supppose it would be > easier if you just remove the tags if you belive it's necessary (IMHO all the > 6 paches are not big and it would be great if we can have all of them in > the old stable kernels, but I respect your decision). I think you need a v4 since for patches that are actually fixing a bug I want a Fixes: tag added and I want them to be applicable independently of other patches in the series. Send them in a separate series if you prefer - I just want to make sure they apply independently. As for marking patches for stable kernels, I do not think it is right to send cosmetic churn to stable kernels anyway, at least that's my reading of the policy. You can easily post a v4 with patches reshuffled - I will apply them accordingly. Before re-posting please read this to improve formatting (I can do it for you but while at it you can do it yourself): https://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=150905742808166&w=2 Thanks, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51276 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751155AbeCNLuG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:50:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:50:00 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Dexuan Cui Cc: "'bhelgaas@google.com'" , "'linux-pci@vger.kernel.org'" , KY Srinivasan , Stephen Hemminger , "'olaf@aepfle.de'" , "'apw@canonical.com'" , "'jasowang@redhat.com'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org'" , Haiyang Zhang , "'vkuznets@redhat.com'" , "'marcelo.cerri@canonical.com'" , "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" , "'stable@vger.kernel.org'" , 'Jack Morgenstein' Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] PCI: hv: fix 2 hang issues in hv_compose_msi_msg() Message-ID: <20180314115000.GC27868@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180306182128.23281-1-decui@microsoft.com> <20180306182128.23281-7-decui@microsoft.com> <20180307123441.GD15139@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:23:39PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote: [...] > Hi Lorenzo, Bjorn, and all, > Do you need more ACKs? Currently Michael and Haiyang reviewed and ack'd > the patchset. > > Should I send a v4 that just removes the "CC: stable@vger.kernel.org" tag > for patches 1, 2, 4 and 5? I tend to avoid a v4 as I supppose it would be > easier if you just remove the tags if you belive it's necessary (IMHO all the > 6 paches are not big and it would be great if we can have all of them in > the old stable kernels, but I respect your decision). I think you need a v4 since for patches that are actually fixing a bug I want a Fixes: tag added and I want them to be applicable independently of other patches in the series. Send them in a separate series if you prefer - I just want to make sure they apply independently. As for marking patches for stable kernels, I do not think it is right to send cosmetic churn to stable kernels anyway, at least that's my reading of the policy. You can easily post a v4 with patches reshuffled - I will apply them accordingly. Before re-posting please read this to improve formatting (I can do it for you but while at it you can do it yourself): https://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=150905742808166&w=2 Thanks, Lorenzo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6951C0800 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0DD88920 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ON5wZ03edmTY for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642BE8858F for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:50:00 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] PCI: hv: fix 2 hang issues in hv_compose_msi_msg() Message-ID: <20180314115000.GC27868@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180306182128.23281-1-decui@microsoft.com> <20180306182128.23281-7-decui@microsoft.com> <20180307123441.GD15139@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux Driver Project Developer List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: driverdev-devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: "devel" To: Dexuan Cui Cc: "'olaf@aepfle.de'" , Stephen Hemminger , "'linux-pci@vger.kernel.org'" , "'jasowang@redhat.com'" , "'driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'stable@vger.kernel.org'" , 'Jack Morgenstein' , "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" , "'apw@canonical.com'" , "'marcelo.cerri@canonical.com'" , "'bhelgaas@google.com'" , "'vkuznets@redhat.com'" , Haiyang Zhang On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:23:39PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote: [...] > Hi Lorenzo, Bjorn, and all, > Do you need more ACKs? Currently Michael and Haiyang reviewed and ack'd > the patchset. > > Should I send a v4 that just removes the "CC: stable@vger.kernel.org" tag > for patches 1, 2, 4 and 5? I tend to avoid a v4 as I supppose it would be > easier if you just remove the tags if you belive it's necessary (IMHO all the > 6 paches are not big and it would be great if we can have all of them in > the old stable kernels, but I respect your decision). I think you need a v4 since for patches that are actually fixing a bug I want a Fixes: tag added and I want them to be applicable independently of other patches in the series. Send them in a separate series if you prefer - I just want to make sure they apply independently. As for marking patches for stable kernels, I do not think it is right to send cosmetic churn to stable kernels anyway, at least that's my reading of the policy. You can easily post a v4 with patches reshuffled - I will apply them accordingly. Before re-posting please read this to improve formatting (I can do it for you but while at it you can do it yourself): https://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=150905742808166&w=2 Thanks, Lorenzo _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel