From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbueso@suse.de, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm] proc: use slower rb_first()
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 02:10:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180314231032.GA15854@avx2> (raw)
In a typical for /proc "open+read+close" usecase, dentry is looked up
successfully on open only to be killed in dput() on close. In fact dentries
which aren't /proc/*/... and /proc/sys/* were almost NEVER CACHED.
Simple printk in proc_lookup_de() shows that.
Now that ->delete hook intelligently picks which dentries should live
in dcache and which should not, rbtree caching is not necessary as
dcache does it job, at last!
As a side effect, struct proc_dir_entry shrinks by one pointer
which can go into inline name.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
---
fs/proc/generic.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
fs/proc/internal.h | 6 +++---
fs/proc/proc_net.c | 2 +-
fs/proc/root.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/proc/generic.c
+++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ static int proc_match(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *de, unsigned int
static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir_first(struct proc_dir_entry *dir)
{
- return rb_entry_safe(rb_first_cached(&dir->subdir),
- struct proc_dir_entry, subdir_node);
+ return rb_entry_safe(rb_first(&dir->subdir), struct proc_dir_entry,
+ subdir_node);
}
static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir_next(struct proc_dir_entry *dir)
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir_find(struct proc_dir_entry *dir,
const char *name,
unsigned int len)
{
- struct rb_node *node = dir->subdir.rb_root.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node *node = dir->subdir.rb_node;
while (node) {
struct proc_dir_entry *de = rb_entry(node,
@@ -88,9 +88,8 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir_find(struct proc_dir_entry *dir,
static bool pde_subdir_insert(struct proc_dir_entry *dir,
struct proc_dir_entry *de)
{
- struct rb_root_cached *root = &dir->subdir;
- struct rb_node **new = &root->rb_root.rb_node, *parent = NULL;
- bool leftmost = true;
+ struct rb_root *root = &dir->subdir;
+ struct rb_node **new = &root->rb_node, *parent = NULL;
/* Figure out where to put new node */
while (*new) {
@@ -102,16 +101,15 @@ static bool pde_subdir_insert(struct proc_dir_entry *dir,
parent = *new;
if (result < 0)
new = &(*new)->rb_left;
- else if (result > 0) {
+ else if (result > 0)
new = &(*new)->rb_right;
- leftmost = false;
- } else
+ else
return false;
}
/* Add new node and rebalance tree. */
rb_link_node(&de->subdir_node, parent, new);
- rb_insert_color_cached(&de->subdir_node, root, leftmost);
+ rb_insert_color(&de->subdir_node, root);
return true;
}
@@ -422,7 +420,7 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *__proc_create(struct proc_dir_entry **parent,
ent->namelen = qstr.len;
ent->mode = mode;
ent->nlink = nlink;
- ent->subdir = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
+ ent->subdir = RB_ROOT;
refcount_set(&ent->refcnt, 1);
spin_lock_init(&ent->pde_unload_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ent->pde_openers);
@@ -598,7 +596,7 @@ void remove_proc_entry(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
de = pde_subdir_find(parent, fn, len);
if (de)
- rb_erase_cached(&de->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
+ rb_erase(&de->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
if (!de) {
WARN(1, "name '%s'\n", name);
@@ -635,13 +633,13 @@ int remove_proc_subtree(const char *name, struct proc_dir_entry *parent)
write_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
return -ENOENT;
}
- rb_erase_cached(&root->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
+ rb_erase(&root->subdir_node, &parent->subdir);
de = root;
while (1) {
next = pde_subdir_first(de);
if (next) {
- rb_erase_cached(&next->subdir_node, &de->subdir);
+ rb_erase(&next->subdir_node, &de->subdir);
de = next;
continue;
}
--- a/fs/proc/internal.h
+++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -51,15 +51,15 @@ struct proc_dir_entry {
kgid_t gid;
loff_t size;
struct proc_dir_entry *parent;
- struct rb_root_cached subdir;
+ struct rb_root subdir;
struct rb_node subdir_node;
char *name;
umode_t mode;
u8 namelen;
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
-#define SIZEOF_PDE_INLINE_NAME (192-147)
+#define SIZEOF_PDE_INLINE_NAME (192-139)
#else
-#define SIZEOF_PDE_INLINE_NAME (128-91)
+#define SIZEOF_PDE_INLINE_NAME (128-87)
#endif
char inline_name[SIZEOF_PDE_INLINE_NAME];
} __randomize_layout;
--- a/fs/proc/proc_net.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_net.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static __net_init int proc_net_ns_init(struct net *net)
if (!netd)
goto out;
- netd->subdir = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
+ netd->subdir = RB_ROOT;
netd->data = net;
netd->nlink = 2;
netd->namelen = 3;
--- a/fs/proc/root.c
+++ b/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ struct proc_dir_entry proc_root = {
.proc_iops = &proc_root_inode_operations,
.proc_fops = &proc_root_operations,
.parent = &proc_root,
- .subdir = RB_ROOT_CACHED,
+ .subdir = RB_ROOT,
.name = proc_root.inline_name,
.inline_name = "/proc",
};
reply other threads:[~2018-03-14 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180314231032.GA15854@avx2 \
--to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.