From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752096AbeCOBCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:02:35 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:35298 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751943AbeCOBCd (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:02:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 02:01:52 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: X86 ML , Emanuel Czirai , Ashok Raj , Tom Lendacky , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/microcode: Fix CPU synchronization routine Message-ID: <20180315010152.GE11061@pd.tnic> References: <20180314183615.17629-1-bp@alien8.de> <20180314183615.17629-2-bp@alien8.de> <20180315010014.xsedkarzrgqiunxf@khazad-dum.debian.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180315010014.xsedkarzrgqiunxf@khazad-dum.debian.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:00:14PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Intel takes anything from twenty thousand cycles to several *million* > cycles per core, proportional to microcode update size. Got any hard data to back that claim up? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.