From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752620AbeCOSSQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:18:16 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:55800 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751864AbeCOSSP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:18:15 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 19:17:37 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: X86 ML , Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86/dumpstack: Explain the reasoning for the prologue and buffer size Message-ID: <20180315181737.GI27816@pd.tnic> References: <20180315154448.16222-1-bp@alien8.de> <20180315154448.16222-10-bp@alien8.de> <20180315180731.mnbpqjte4wafnzd3@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180315180731.mnbpqjte4wafnzd3@treble> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:07:31PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > +/* > > + * The are a couple of reasons for the 2/3rd prologue, courtesy of Linus: > > s/The/There/ Fixed, thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.