From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:01:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180315190132.2d653yu7ezf2zplh@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315154448.16222-9-bp@alien8.de>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 04:44:47PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> @@ -321,6 +323,9 @@ void oops_end(unsigned long flags, struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
> raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> oops_exit();
>
> + /* Executive summary in case the oops scrolled away */
> + __show_regs(&exec_summary_regs, false);
> +
no_context() has the following line, right before it calls oops_end():
/* Executive summary in case the body of the oops scrolled away */
printk(KERN_DEFAULT "CR2: %016lx\n", address);
I think that line can now be removed, since the executive summary
__show_regs() will include CR2.
> @@ -352,26 +357,14 @@ int __die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long err)
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION) ?
> (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI) ? " PTI" : " NOPTI") : "");
>
> + show_regs(regs);
> +
> if (notify_die(DIE_OOPS, str, regs, err,
> current->thread.trap_nr, SIGSEGV) == NOTIFY_STOP)
> return 1;
>
> print_modules();
> - show_regs(regs);
Was moving the show_regs() call intentional? I didn't see it mentioned
in the changelog.
> @@ -410,7 +403,5 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> if (regs->ip < PAGE_OFFSET)
> pr_cont(" Bad RIP value.\n");
> - else
> - show_opcodes((u8 *)regs->ip, KERN_DEFAULT);
> }
> }
Doesn't this hunk belong in the previous patch, which added the
__show_regs -> show_ip() -> show_opcodes() call path?
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-15 15:44 [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v2 Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/dumstack: Remove code_bytes Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/dumpstack: Unexport oops_begin() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/dumpstack: Carve out Code: dumping into a function Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/dumpstack: Improve opcodes dumping in the Code: section Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 19:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 11:57 ` David Laight
2018-03-15 18:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/dumpstack: Add loglevel argument to show_opcodes() Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/fault: Dump user opcode bytes on fatal faults Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/dumpstack: Add a show_ip() function Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 19:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-03-16 11:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 12:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 12:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 13:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 13:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-16 17:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-16 17:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-16 18:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 15:44 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/dumpstack: Explain the reasoning for the prologue and buffer size Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 18:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-03-15 18:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-15 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v2 Linus Torvalds
2018-04-17 14:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 20:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-17 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-18 13:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-17 16:11 [PATCH 0/9] x86/dumpstack: Cleanups and user opcode bytes Code: section, v3 Borislav Petkov
2018-04-17 16:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/dumpstack: Save first regs set for the executive summary Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180315190132.2d653yu7ezf2zplh@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.