[RFC 0/4] gpio-backlight: remove platform data support

[RFC 0/4] gpio-backlight: remove platform data support

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi,

This series attempts to remove platform data support from gpio_blackllist
driver and switch it over to generic device properties/GPIO tables.
The only user of platform data was SuperH Ecovec24 board; please take a
look at patch #2 that tries to only register backlight when the board is
using LDC and not DVI.

Please note that I do not have the hardware (do we even care about
ecovec24? I'd like to rip out platform data support from tsc2007 as
well, but ecovec24 is using custom pendown handler and GPIOs have
to be switched off from interrupt mode to GPIO and back in that
pendown handler, which is all quite messy. If we do not care about
this board I'd much rather removed that custom pendown).

Thanks!

Dmitry Torokhov (4):
  backlight: gpio_backlight: use generic device properties
  sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device
  sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties
  backlight: gpio_backlight: remove platform data support

 arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c         | 47 ++++++----
 drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c     | 93 +++-----------------
 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h | 20 -----
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h

-- 
Dmitry

[RFC 0/4] gpio-backlight: remove platform data support

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi,

This series attempts to remove platform data support from gpio_blackllist
driver and switch it over to generic device properties/GPIO tables.
The only user of platform data was SuperH Ecovec24 board; please take a
look at patch #2 that tries to only register backlight when the board is
using LDC and not DVI.

Please note that I do not have the hardware (do we even care about
ecovec24? I'd like to rip out platform data support from tsc2007 as
well, but ecovec24 is using custom pendown handler and GPIOs have
to be switched off from interrupt mode to GPIO and back in that
pendown handler, which is all quite messy. If we do not care about
this board I'd much rather removed that custom pendown).

Thanks!

Dmitry Torokhov (4):
  backlight: gpio_backlight: use generic device properties
  sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device
  sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties
  backlight: gpio_backlight: remove platform data support

 arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c         | 47 ++++++----
 drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c     | 93 +++-----------------
 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h | 20 -----
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h

-- 
Dmitry

[RFC 1/4] backlight: gpio_backlight: use generic device properties

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Instead of using of_property_read_bool() switch to using
device_property_read_bool() This will allow switching from platform data to
device properties everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
index e470da95d806f..173fc4aafb89b 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
@@ -61,11 +61,10 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 				   struct gpio_backlight *gbl)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	enum gpiod_flags flags;
 	int ret;
 
-	gbl->def_value = of_property_read_bool(np, "default-on");
+	gbl->def_value = device_property_read_bool(dev, "default-on");
 	flags = gbl->def_value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
 
 	gbl->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL, flags);
@@ -89,22 +88,15 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct backlight_properties props;
 	struct backlight_device *bl;
 	struct gpio_backlight *gbl;
-	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!pdata && !np) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
-			"failed to find platform data or device tree node.\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
 	gbl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gbl), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (gbl = NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	gbl->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
-	if (np) {
+	if (!pdata) {
 		ret = gpio_backlight_probe_dt(pdev, gbl);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-- 
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog

[RFC 1/4] backlight: gpio_backlight: use generic device properties

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Instead of using of_property_read_bool() switch to using
device_property_read_bool() This will allow switching from platform data to
device properties everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
index e470da95d806f..173fc4aafb89b 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
@@ -61,11 +61,10 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 				   struct gpio_backlight *gbl)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	enum gpiod_flags flags;
 	int ret;
 
-	gbl->def_value = of_property_read_bool(np, "default-on");
+	gbl->def_value = device_property_read_bool(dev, "default-on");
 	flags = gbl->def_value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
 
 	gbl->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL, flags);
@@ -89,22 +88,15 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct backlight_properties props;
 	struct backlight_device *bl;
 	struct gpio_backlight *gbl;
-	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!pdata && !np) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
-			"failed to find platform data or device tree node.\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
 	gbl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gbl), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (gbl == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	gbl->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
-	if (np) {
+	if (!pdata) {
 		ret = gpio_backlight_probe_dt(pdev, gbl);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-- 
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog

[RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.

We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
present at all in DVI case.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
--- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
+++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
@@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
 };
 
 static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
-	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
 	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
 	.def_value = 1,
 	.name = "backlight",
@@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
 	&usb1_common_device,
 	&usbhs_device,
 	&lcdc_device,
-	&gpio_backlight_device,
 	&ceu0_device,
 	&ceu1_device,
 	&keysc_device,
@@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 {
 	struct clk *clk;
 	bool cn12_enabled = false;
+	bool use_backlight = false;
+	int error;
 
 	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
 	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
@@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
 		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
 
-		/* No backlight */
-		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
-
 		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
 		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
 	} else {
@@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 		/* enable TouchScreen */
 		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
 		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
+
+		use_backlight = true;
 	}
 
 	/* enable CEU0 */
@@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
 #endif
 
-	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
-				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
+	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
+				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
+	if (error)
+		return error;
+
+	if (use_backlight) {
+		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
+		if (error)
+			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
+				error);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 arch_initcall(arch_setup);
 
-- 
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog

[RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.

We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
present at all in DVI case.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
--- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
+++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
@@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
 };
 
 static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
-	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
 	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
 	.def_value = 1,
 	.name = "backlight",
@@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
 	&usb1_common_device,
 	&usbhs_device,
 	&lcdc_device,
-	&gpio_backlight_device,
 	&ceu0_device,
 	&ceu1_device,
 	&keysc_device,
@@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 {
 	struct clk *clk;
 	bool cn12_enabled = false;
+	bool use_backlight = false;
+	int error;
 
 	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
 	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
@@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
 		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
 
-		/* No backlight */
-		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
-
 		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
 		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
 	} else {
@@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 		/* enable TouchScreen */
 		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
 		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
+
+		use_backlight = true;
 	}
 
 	/* enable CEU0 */
@@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
 #endif
 
-	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
-				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
+	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
+				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
+	if (error)
+		return error;
+
+	if (use_backlight) {
+		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
+		if (error)
+			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
+				error);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 arch_initcall(arch_setup);
 
-- 
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog

[RFC 3/4] sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Instead of backlight legacy platform data, let's switch to using device
properties and GPIO lookup tables.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
index 67633d2d42390..ad3d48b3ead19 100644
--- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
+++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
@@ -11,11 +11,13 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
 #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
 #include <linux/mmc/sh_mmcif.h>
 #include <linux/mtd/physmap.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/tmio.h>
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -30,7 +32,6 @@
 #include <linux/spi/mmc_spi.h>
 #include <linux/input.h>
 #include <linux/input/sh_keysc.h>
-#include <linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h>
 #include <linux/sh_eth.h>
 #include <linux/sh_intc.h>
 #include <linux/videodev2.h>
@@ -367,17 +368,21 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
 	},
 };
 
-static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
-	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
-	.def_value = 1,
-	.name = "backlight",
+static struct gpiod_lookup_table gpio_backlight_gpios_table = {
+	.dev_id = "gpio-backlight.0",
+	.table = {
+		GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("sh7724_pfc", GPIO_PTR1, NULL, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
+		{ }
+	},
+};
+
+static struct property_entry gpio_backlight_properties[] = {
+	PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("default-on"),
+	{ }
 };
 
 static struct platform_device gpio_backlight_device = {
 	.name = "gpio-backlight",
-	.dev = {
-		.platform_data = &gpio_backlight_data,
-	},
 };
 
 /* CEU0 */
@@ -1436,6 +1441,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 		return error;
 
 	if (use_backlight) {
+		device_add_properties(&gpio_backlight_device.dev,
+				      gpio_backlight_properties);
 		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
 		if (error)
 			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
-- 
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog

[RFC 3/4] sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Instead of backlight legacy platform data, let's switch to using device
properties and GPIO lookup tables.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
index 67633d2d42390..ad3d48b3ead19 100644
--- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
+++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
@@ -11,11 +11,13 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
 #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
 #include <linux/mmc/sh_mmcif.h>
 #include <linux/mtd/physmap.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/tmio.h>
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -30,7 +32,6 @@
 #include <linux/spi/mmc_spi.h>
 #include <linux/input.h>
 #include <linux/input/sh_keysc.h>
-#include <linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h>
 #include <linux/sh_eth.h>
 #include <linux/sh_intc.h>
 #include <linux/videodev2.h>
@@ -367,17 +368,21 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
 	},
 };
 
-static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
-	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
-	.def_value = 1,
-	.name = "backlight",
+static struct gpiod_lookup_table gpio_backlight_gpios_table = {
+	.dev_id = "gpio-backlight.0",
+	.table = {
+		GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("sh7724_pfc", GPIO_PTR1, NULL, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
+		{ }
+	},
+};
+
+static struct property_entry gpio_backlight_properties[] = {
+	PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("default-on"),
+	{ }
 };
 
 static struct platform_device gpio_backlight_device = {
 	.name = "gpio-backlight",
-	.dev = {
-		.platform_data = &gpio_backlight_data,
-	},
 };
 
 /* CEU0 */
@@ -1436,6 +1441,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
 		return error;
 
 	if (use_backlight) {
+		device_add_properties(&gpio_backlight_device.dev,
+				      gpio_backlight_properties);
 		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
 		if (error)
 			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
-- 
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog

[RFC 4/4] backlight: gpio_backlight: remove platform data support

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Legacy boards can use static property sets/GPIO lookup tables to describe
backlight connections, there is no need to maintain legacy platform data.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c     | 85 ++++----------------
 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h | 20 -----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
index 173fc4aafb89b..795359deeb700 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
@@ -15,17 +15,12 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
-#include <linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
 struct gpio_backlight {
-	struct device *dev;
-	struct device *fbdev;
-
 	struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
-	int def_value;
 };
 
 static int gpio_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
@@ -43,84 +38,32 @@ static int gpio_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int gpio_backlight_check_fb(struct backlight_device *bl,
-				   struct fb_info *info)
-{
-	struct gpio_backlight *gbl = bl_get_data(bl);
-
-	return gbl->fbdev = NULL || gbl->fbdev = info->dev;
-}
-
 static const struct backlight_ops gpio_backlight_ops = {
 	.options	= BL_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME,
 	.update_status	= gpio_backlight_update_status,
-	.check_fb	= gpio_backlight_check_fb,
 };
 
-static int gpio_backlight_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				   struct gpio_backlight *gbl)
-{
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	enum gpiod_flags flags;
-	int ret;
-
-	gbl->def_value = device_property_read_bool(dev, "default-on");
-	flags = gbl->def_value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
-
-	gbl->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL, flags);
-	if (IS_ERR(gbl->gpiod)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(gbl->gpiod);
-
-		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
-			dev_err(dev,
-				"Error: The gpios parameter is missing or invalid.\n");
-		}
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata -		dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct backlight_properties props;
 	struct backlight_device *bl;
 	struct gpio_backlight *gbl;
+	int def_value;
 	int ret;
 
-	gbl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gbl), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (gbl = NULL)
+	gbl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*gbl), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gbl)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	gbl->dev = &pdev->dev;
-
-	if (!pdata) {
-		ret = gpio_backlight_probe_dt(pdev, gbl);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Legacy platform data GPIO retrieveal. Do not expand
-		 * the use of this code path, currently only used by one
-		 * SH board.
-		 */
-		unsigned long flags = GPIOF_DIR_OUT;
-
-		gbl->fbdev = pdata->fbdev;
-		gbl->def_value = pdata->def_value;
-		flags |= gbl->def_value ? GPIOF_INIT_HIGH : GPIOF_INIT_LOW;
-
-		ret = devm_gpio_request_one(gbl->dev, pdata->gpio, flags,
-					    pdata ? pdata->name : "backlight");
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request GPIO\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
-		gbl->gpiod = gpio_to_desc(pdata->gpio);
-		if (!gbl->gpiod)
-			return -EINVAL;
+	def_value = device_property_read_bool(dev, "default-on");
+	gbl->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL,
+				    def_value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	if (IS_ERR(gbl->gpiod)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(gbl->gpiod);
+		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(dev, "unable to request GPIO: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	memset(&props, 0, sizeof(props));
@@ -134,7 +77,7 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(bl);
 	}
 
-	bl->props.brightness = gbl->def_value;
+	bl->props.brightness = def_value;
 	backlight_update_status(bl);
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl);
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 683d90453c419..0000000000000
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * gpio_backlight.h - Simple GPIO-controlled backlight
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
-#ifndef __GPIO_BACKLIGHT_H__
-#define __GPIO_BACKLIGHT_H__
-
-struct device;
-
-struct gpio_backlight_platform_data {
-	struct device *fbdev;
-	int gpio;
-	int def_value;
-	const char *name;
-};
-
-#endif
-- 
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog

[RFC 4/4] backlight: gpio_backlight: remove platform data support

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Legacy boards can use static property sets/GPIO lookup tables to describe
backlight connections, there is no need to maintain legacy platform data.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c     | 85 ++++----------------
 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h | 20 -----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
index 173fc4aafb89b..795359deeb700 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
@@ -15,17 +15,12 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
-#include <linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
 struct gpio_backlight {
-	struct device *dev;
-	struct device *fbdev;
-
 	struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
-	int def_value;
 };
 
 static int gpio_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
@@ -43,84 +38,32 @@ static int gpio_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int gpio_backlight_check_fb(struct backlight_device *bl,
-				   struct fb_info *info)
-{
-	struct gpio_backlight *gbl = bl_get_data(bl);
-
-	return gbl->fbdev == NULL || gbl->fbdev == info->dev;
-}
-
 static const struct backlight_ops gpio_backlight_ops = {
 	.options	= BL_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME,
 	.update_status	= gpio_backlight_update_status,
-	.check_fb	= gpio_backlight_check_fb,
 };
 
-static int gpio_backlight_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				   struct gpio_backlight *gbl)
-{
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	enum gpiod_flags flags;
-	int ret;
-
-	gbl->def_value = device_property_read_bool(dev, "default-on");
-	flags = gbl->def_value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
-
-	gbl->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL, flags);
-	if (IS_ERR(gbl->gpiod)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(gbl->gpiod);
-
-		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
-			dev_err(dev,
-				"Error: The gpios parameter is missing or invalid.\n");
-		}
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata =
-		dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct backlight_properties props;
 	struct backlight_device *bl;
 	struct gpio_backlight *gbl;
+	int def_value;
 	int ret;
 
-	gbl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gbl), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (gbl == NULL)
+	gbl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*gbl), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!gbl)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	gbl->dev = &pdev->dev;
-
-	if (!pdata) {
-		ret = gpio_backlight_probe_dt(pdev, gbl);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Legacy platform data GPIO retrieveal. Do not expand
-		 * the use of this code path, currently only used by one
-		 * SH board.
-		 */
-		unsigned long flags = GPIOF_DIR_OUT;
-
-		gbl->fbdev = pdata->fbdev;
-		gbl->def_value = pdata->def_value;
-		flags |= gbl->def_value ? GPIOF_INIT_HIGH : GPIOF_INIT_LOW;
-
-		ret = devm_gpio_request_one(gbl->dev, pdata->gpio, flags,
-					    pdata ? pdata->name : "backlight");
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request GPIO\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
-		gbl->gpiod = gpio_to_desc(pdata->gpio);
-		if (!gbl->gpiod)
-			return -EINVAL;
+	def_value = device_property_read_bool(dev, "default-on");
+	gbl->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, NULL,
+				    def_value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	if (IS_ERR(gbl->gpiod)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(gbl->gpiod);
+		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(dev, "unable to request GPIO: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	memset(&props, 0, sizeof(props));
@@ -134,7 +77,7 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(bl);
 	}
 
-	bl->props.brightness = gbl->def_value;
+	bl->props.brightness = def_value;
 	backlight_update_status(bl);
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl);
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 683d90453c419..0000000000000
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * gpio_backlight.h - Simple GPIO-controlled backlight
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
-#ifndef __GPIO_BACKLIGHT_H__
-#define __GPIO_BACKLIGHT_H__
-
-struct device;
-
-struct gpio_backlight_platform_data {
-	struct device *fbdev;
-	int gpio;
-	int def_value;
-	const char *name;
-};
-
-#endif
-- 
2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog

Re: [RFC 3/4] sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Dmitry,

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Instead of backlight legacy platform data, let's switch to using device
> properties and GPIO lookup tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c

> @@ -367,17 +368,21 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
>         },
>  };
>
> -static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> -       .gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> -       .def_value = 1,
> -       .name = "backlight",
> +static struct gpiod_lookup_table gpio_backlight_gpios_table = {

gpio_backlight_gpios_table is unused?

> +       .dev_id = "gpio-backlight.0",
> +       .table = {
> +               GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("sh7724_pfc", GPIO_PTR1, NULL, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +               { }
> +       },
> +};
> +
> +static struct property_entry gpio_backlight_properties[] = {

const

> +       PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("default-on"),
> +       { }
>  };
>
>  static struct platform_device gpio_backlight_device = {
>         .name = "gpio-backlight",
> -       .dev = {
> -               .platform_data = &gpio_backlight_data,
> -       },
>  };
>
>  /* CEU0 */
> @@ -1436,6 +1441,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>                 return error;
>
>         if (use_backlight) {
> +               device_add_properties(&gpio_backlight_device.dev,
> +                                     gpio_backlight_properties);
>                 error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
>                 if (error)
>                         pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [RFC 3/4] sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Dmitry,

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Instead of backlight legacy platform data, let's switch to using device
> properties and GPIO lookup tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c

> @@ -367,17 +368,21 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
>         },
>  };
>
> -static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> -       .gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> -       .def_value = 1,
> -       .name = "backlight",
> +static struct gpiod_lookup_table gpio_backlight_gpios_table = {

gpio_backlight_gpios_table is unused?

> +       .dev_id = "gpio-backlight.0",
> +       .table = {
> +               GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("sh7724_pfc", GPIO_PTR1, NULL, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +               { }
> +       },
> +};
> +
> +static struct property_entry gpio_backlight_properties[] = {

const

> +       PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("default-on"),
> +       { }
>  };
>
>  static struct platform_device gpio_backlight_device = {
>         .name = "gpio-backlight",
> -       .dev = {
> -               .platform_data = &gpio_backlight_data,
> -       },
>  };
>
>  /* CEU0 */
> @@ -1436,6 +1441,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>                 return error;
>
>         if (use_backlight) {
> +               device_add_properties(&gpio_backlight_device.dev,
> +                                     gpio_backlight_properties);
>                 error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
>                 if (error)
>                         pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[jacopo mondi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3625 bytes --]

Hello Dmitry

FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html

And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
afraid.

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
>
> We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> present at all in DVI case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
>  };
>
>  static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> -	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
>  	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
>  	.def_value = 1,
>  	.name = "backlight",
> @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
>  	&usb1_common_device,
>  	&usbhs_device,
>  	&lcdc_device,
> -	&gpio_backlight_device,
>  	&ceu0_device,
>  	&ceu1_device,
>  	&keysc_device,
> @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  {
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  	bool cn12_enabled = false;
> +	bool use_backlight = false;
> +	int error;
>
>  	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
>  	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
>  		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
>
> -		/* No backlight */
> -		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> -
>  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
>  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
>  	} else {
> @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  		/* enable TouchScreen */
>  		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
>  		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> +
> +		use_backlight = true;
>  	}
>
>  	/* enable CEU0 */
> @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
>  #endif
>
> -	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> -				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> +	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> +				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));

I would invert this.
Register the backlight first, then all other devices.


> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	if (use_backlight) {
> +		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> +		if (error)
> +			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> +				error);

Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.

Also, you may want to return error.

Thanks
   j

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  arch_initcall(arch_setup);
>
> --
> 2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog
>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[jacopo mondi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3625 bytes --]

Hello Dmitry

FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html

And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
afraid.

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
>
> We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> present at all in DVI case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
>  };
>
>  static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> -	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
>  	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
>  	.def_value = 1,
>  	.name = "backlight",
> @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
>  	&usb1_common_device,
>  	&usbhs_device,
>  	&lcdc_device,
> -	&gpio_backlight_device,
>  	&ceu0_device,
>  	&ceu1_device,
>  	&keysc_device,
> @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  {
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  	bool cn12_enabled = false;
> +	bool use_backlight = false;
> +	int error;
>
>  	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
>  	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
>  		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
>
> -		/* No backlight */
> -		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> -
>  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
>  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
>  	} else {
> @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  		/* enable TouchScreen */
>  		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
>  		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> +
> +		use_backlight = true;
>  	}
>
>  	/* enable CEU0 */
> @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
>  #endif
>
> -	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> -				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> +	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> +				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));

I would invert this.
Register the backlight first, then all other devices.


> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	if (use_backlight) {
> +		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> +		if (error)
> +			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> +				error);

Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.

Also, you may want to return error.

Thanks
   j

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  arch_initcall(arch_setup);
>
> --
> 2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog
>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [RFC 3/4] sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties

[jacopo mondi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2558 bytes --]

Hi Dmitry,

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:01PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of backlight legacy platform data, let's switch to using device
> properties and GPIO lookup tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> index 67633d2d42390..ad3d48b3ead19 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> @@ -11,11 +11,13 @@
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/sh_mmcif.h>
>  #include <linux/mtd/physmap.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/tmio.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -30,7 +32,6 @@
>  #include <linux/spi/mmc_spi.h>
>  #include <linux/input.h>
>  #include <linux/input/sh_keysc.h>
> -#include <linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h>
>  #include <linux/sh_eth.h>
>  #include <linux/sh_intc.h>
>  #include <linux/videodev2.h>
> @@ -367,17 +368,21 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
>  	},
>  };
>
> -static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> -	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> -	.def_value = 1,
> -	.name = "backlight",
> +static struct gpiod_lookup_table gpio_backlight_gpios_table = {
> +	.dev_id = "gpio-backlight.0",
> +	.table = {
> +		GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("sh7724_pfc", GPIO_PTR1, NULL, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +		{ }

I understand this is an RFC, but this bit does not even compile.

../arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c:374:70: error: expected '}'
before ';' token

Thanks
   j

> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static struct property_entry gpio_backlight_properties[] = {
> +	PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("default-on"),
> +	{ }
>  };
>
>  static struct platform_device gpio_backlight_device = {
>  	.name = "gpio-backlight",
> -	.dev = {
> -		.platform_data = &gpio_backlight_data,
> -	},
>  };
>
>  /* CEU0 */
> @@ -1436,6 +1441,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  		return error;
>
>  	if (use_backlight) {
> +		device_add_properties(&gpio_backlight_device.dev,
> +				      gpio_backlight_properties);
>  		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
>  		if (error)
>  			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> --
> 2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog
>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [RFC 3/4] sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties

[jacopo mondi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2558 bytes --]

Hi Dmitry,

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:01PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of backlight legacy platform data, let's switch to using device
> properties and GPIO lookup tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> index 67633d2d42390..ad3d48b3ead19 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> @@ -11,11 +11,13 @@
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/sh_mmcif.h>
>  #include <linux/mtd/physmap.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/tmio.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -30,7 +32,6 @@
>  #include <linux/spi/mmc_spi.h>
>  #include <linux/input.h>
>  #include <linux/input/sh_keysc.h>
> -#include <linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h>
>  #include <linux/sh_eth.h>
>  #include <linux/sh_intc.h>
>  #include <linux/videodev2.h>
> @@ -367,17 +368,21 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
>  	},
>  };
>
> -static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> -	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> -	.def_value = 1,
> -	.name = "backlight",
> +static struct gpiod_lookup_table gpio_backlight_gpios_table = {
> +	.dev_id = "gpio-backlight.0",
> +	.table = {
> +		GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("sh7724_pfc", GPIO_PTR1, NULL, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> +		{ }

I understand this is an RFC, but this bit does not even compile.

../arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c:374:70: error: expected '}'
before ';' token

Thanks
   j

> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static struct property_entry gpio_backlight_properties[] = {
> +	PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("default-on"),
> +	{ }
>  };
>
>  static struct platform_device gpio_backlight_device = {
>  	.name = "gpio-backlight",
> -	.dev = {
> -		.platform_data = &gpio_backlight_data,
> -	},
>  };
>
>  /* CEU0 */
> @@ -1436,6 +1441,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>  		return error;
>
>  	if (use_backlight) {
> +		device_add_properties(&gpio_backlight_device.dev,
> +				      gpio_backlight_properties);
>  		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
>  		if (error)
>  			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> --
> 2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog
>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [RFC 0/4] gpio-backlight: remove platform data support

[Daniel Thompson]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:41:58PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This series attempts to remove platform data support from gpio_blackllist
> driver and switch it over to generic device properties/GPIO tables.
> The only user of platform data was SuperH Ecovec24 board; please take a
> look at patch #2 that tries to only register backlight when the board is
> using LDC and not DVI.

Can't comment on patch #2 but, from the backlight side of things I have
no objections.


Daniel.

> 
> Please note that I do not have the hardware (do we even care about
> ecovec24? I'd like to rip out platform data support from tsc2007 as
> well, but ecovec24 is using custom pendown handler and GPIOs have
> to be switched off from interrupt mode to GPIO and back in that
> pendown handler, which is all quite messy. If we do not care about
> this board I'd much rather removed that custom pendown).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Dmitry Torokhov (4):
>   backlight: gpio_backlight: use generic device properties
>   sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device
>   sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties
>   backlight: gpio_backlight: remove platform data support
> 
>  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c         | 47 ++++++----
>  drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c     | 93 +++-----------------
>  include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h | 20 -----
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/gpio_backlight.h
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry
> 

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi Jacopo,

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hello Dmitry
> 
> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> 

What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
old to me.

> And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
> afraid.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> > backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> > comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> > gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> > events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
> >
> > We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> > in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> > to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> > above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> > let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> > present at all in DVI case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> > --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> > -	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
> >  	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> >  	.def_value = 1,
> >  	.name = "backlight",
> > @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
> >  	&usb1_common_device,
> >  	&usbhs_device,
> >  	&lcdc_device,
> > -	&gpio_backlight_device,
> >  	&ceu0_device,
> >  	&ceu1_device,
> >  	&keysc_device,
> > @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct clk *clk;
> >  	bool cn12_enabled = false;
> > +	bool use_backlight = false;
> > +	int error;
> >
> >  	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
> >  	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> > @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
> >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
> >
> > -		/* No backlight */
> > -		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> > -
> >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
> >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
> >  	} else {
> > @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >  		/* enable TouchScreen */
> >  		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
> >  		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> > +
> > +		use_backlight = true;
> >  	}
> >
> >  	/* enable CEU0 */
> > @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >  	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
> >  #endif
> >
> > -	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > -				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > +	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > +				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> 
> I would invert this.
> Register the backlight first, then all other devices.

We could do that, but why would that be better?

> 
> 
> > +	if (error)
> > +		return error;
> > +
> > +	if (use_backlight) {
> > +		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> > +		if (error)
> > +			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> > +				error);
> 
> Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you

I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
one backlight.

> are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.

I'll fix this.

> 
> Also, you may want to return error.

How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
registered devices on error adding backlight?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi Jacopo,

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hello Dmitry
> 
> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> 

What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
old to me.

> And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
> afraid.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> > backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> > comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> > gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> > events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
> >
> > We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> > in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> > to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> > above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> > let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> > present at all in DVI case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> > --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> > -	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
> >  	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> >  	.def_value = 1,
> >  	.name = "backlight",
> > @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
> >  	&usb1_common_device,
> >  	&usbhs_device,
> >  	&lcdc_device,
> > -	&gpio_backlight_device,
> >  	&ceu0_device,
> >  	&ceu1_device,
> >  	&keysc_device,
> > @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >  {
> >  	struct clk *clk;
> >  	bool cn12_enabled = false;
> > +	bool use_backlight = false;
> > +	int error;
> >
> >  	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
> >  	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> > @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
> >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
> >
> > -		/* No backlight */
> > -		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> > -
> >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
> >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
> >  	} else {
> > @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >  		/* enable TouchScreen */
> >  		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
> >  		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> > +
> > +		use_backlight = true;
> >  	}
> >
> >  	/* enable CEU0 */
> > @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >  	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
> >  #endif
> >
> > -	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > -				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > +	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > +				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> 
> I would invert this.
> Register the backlight first, then all other devices.

We could do that, but why would that be better?

> 
> 
> > +	if (error)
> > +		return error;
> > +
> > +	if (use_backlight) {
> > +		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> > +		if (error)
> > +			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> > +				error);
> 
> Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you

I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
one backlight.

> are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.

I'll fix this.

> 
> Also, you may want to return error.

How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
registered devices on error adding backlight?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [RFC 3/4] sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:50:21AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Instead of backlight legacy platform data, let's switch to using device
> > properties and GPIO lookup tables.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> > --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> 
> > @@ -367,17 +368,21 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> >         },
> >  };
> >
> > -static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> > -       .gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> > -       .def_value = 1,
> > -       .name = "backlight",
> > +static struct gpiod_lookup_table gpio_backlight_gpios_table = {
> 
> gpio_backlight_gpios_table is unused?

There was supposed to be gpiod_add_lookup_table() that I lost as I was
reshuffling and reshuffling the patches.

> 
> > +       .dev_id = "gpio-backlight.0",
> > +       .table = {
> > +               GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("sh7724_pfc", GPIO_PTR1, NULL, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> > +               { }
> > +       },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct property_entry gpio_backlight_properties[] = {
> 
> const

OK.

> 
> > +       PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("default-on"),
> > +       { }
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct platform_device gpio_backlight_device = {
> >         .name = "gpio-backlight",
> > -       .dev = {
> > -               .platform_data = &gpio_backlight_data,
> > -       },
> >  };
> >
> >  /* CEU0 */
> > @@ -1436,6 +1441,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >                 return error;
> >
> >         if (use_backlight) {
> > +               device_add_properties(&gpio_backlight_device.dev,
> > +                                     gpio_backlight_properties);
> >                 error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> >                 if (error)
> >                         pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [RFC 3/4] sh: ecovec24: convert backlight to use device properties

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:50:21AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Instead of backlight legacy platform data, let's switch to using device
> > properties and GPIO lookup tables.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> > --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> 
> > @@ -367,17 +368,21 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> >         },
> >  };
> >
> > -static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> > -       .gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> > -       .def_value = 1,
> > -       .name = "backlight",
> > +static struct gpiod_lookup_table gpio_backlight_gpios_table = {
> 
> gpio_backlight_gpios_table is unused?

There was supposed to be gpiod_add_lookup_table() that I lost as I was
reshuffling and reshuffling the patches.

> 
> > +       .dev_id = "gpio-backlight.0",
> > +       .table = {
> > +               GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("sh7724_pfc", GPIO_PTR1, NULL, 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH);
> > +               { }
> > +       },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct property_entry gpio_backlight_properties[] = {
> 
> const

OK.

> 
> > +       PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("default-on"),
> > +       { }
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct platform_device gpio_backlight_device = {
> >         .name = "gpio-backlight",
> > -       .dev = {
> > -               .platform_data = &gpio_backlight_data,
> > -       },
> >  };
> >
> >  /* CEU0 */
> > @@ -1436,6 +1441,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >                 return error;
> >
> >         if (use_backlight) {
> > +               device_add_properties(&gpio_backlight_device.dev,
> > +                                     gpio_backlight_properties);
> >                 error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> >                 if (error)
> >                         pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[jacopo mondi]

Hi Dmitry,

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > Hello Dmitry
> > 
> > FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> > 
> 
> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> old to me.

Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
user of...

> > And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
> > afraid.
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> > > backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> > > comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> > > gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> > > events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
> > >
> > > We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> > > in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> > > to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> > > above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> > > let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> > > present at all in DVI case.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> > > --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> > > -	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
> > >  	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> > >  	.def_value = 1,
> > >  	.name = "backlight",
> > > @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
> > >  	&usb1_common_device,
> > >  	&usbhs_device,
> > >  	&lcdc_device,
> > > -	&gpio_backlight_device,
> > >  	&ceu0_device,
> > >  	&ceu1_device,
> > >  	&keysc_device,
> > > @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct clk *clk;
> > >  	bool cn12_enabled = false;
> > > +	bool use_backlight = false;
> > > +	int error;
> > >
> > >  	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
> > >  	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> > > @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
> > >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
> > >
> > > -		/* No backlight */
> > > -		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> > > -
> > >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
> > >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
> > >  	} else {
> > > @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > >  		/* enable TouchScreen */
> > >  		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
> > >  		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> > > +
> > > +		use_backlight = true;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	/* enable CEU0 */
> > > @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > >  	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > > -	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > > -				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > > +	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > > +				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > 
> > I would invert this.
> > Register the backlight first, then all other devices.
> 
> We could do that, but why would that be better?
> 

That if backlight device registration fails we do not register all
other devices. But yes that may be a bit too harsh, isn't it?

> > 
> > 
> > > +	if (error)
> > > +		return error;
> > > +
> > > +	if (use_backlight) {
> > > +		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> > > +		if (error)
> > > +			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> > > +				error);
> > 
> > Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
> 
> I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
> here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
> does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
> one backlight.

You are very correct, sorry for the fuss.

> 
> > are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.
> 
> I'll fix this.
> 
> > 
> > Also, you may want to return error.
> 
> How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
> registered devices on error adding backlight?

As the function returned an error code for 'platform_add_devices()' I
thought we may want to return one as well. That's why I proposed to
invert the registration order :)

All minor nits btw,  sorry for jumping up, I understand this is an
RFC and ecovec board file is not the real juice of this series ;)

Ping me if I can help with testing as I've the board.

Thanks
   j

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[jacopo mondi]

Hi Dmitry,

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > Hello Dmitry
> > 
> > FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> > 
> 
> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> old to me.

Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
user of...

> > And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
> > afraid.
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> > > backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> > > comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> > > gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> > > events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
> > >
> > > We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> > > in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> > > to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> > > above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> > > let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> > > present at all in DVI case.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> > > --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> > > -	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
> > >  	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> > >  	.def_value = 1,
> > >  	.name = "backlight",
> > > @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
> > >  	&usb1_common_device,
> > >  	&usbhs_device,
> > >  	&lcdc_device,
> > > -	&gpio_backlight_device,
> > >  	&ceu0_device,
> > >  	&ceu1_device,
> > >  	&keysc_device,
> > > @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct clk *clk;
> > >  	bool cn12_enabled = false;
> > > +	bool use_backlight = false;
> > > +	int error;
> > >
> > >  	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
> > >  	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> > > @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
> > >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
> > >
> > > -		/* No backlight */
> > > -		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> > > -
> > >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
> > >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
> > >  	} else {
> > > @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > >  		/* enable TouchScreen */
> > >  		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
> > >  		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> > > +
> > > +		use_backlight = true;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	/* enable CEU0 */
> > > @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > >  	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > > -	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > > -				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > > +	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > > +				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > 
> > I would invert this.
> > Register the backlight first, then all other devices.
> 
> We could do that, but why would that be better?
> 

That if backlight device registration fails we do not register all
other devices. But yes that may be a bit too harsh, isn't it?

> > 
> > 
> > > +	if (error)
> > > +		return error;
> > > +
> > > +	if (use_backlight) {
> > > +		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> > > +		if (error)
> > > +			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> > > +				error);
> > 
> > Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
> 
> I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
> here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
> does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
> one backlight.

You are very correct, sorry for the fuss.

> 
> > are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.
> 
> I'll fix this.
> 
> > 
> > Also, you may want to return error.
> 
> How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
> registered devices on error adding backlight?

As the function returned an error code for 'platform_add_devices()' I
thought we may want to return one as well. That's why I proposed to
invert the registration order :)

All minor nits btw,  sorry for jumping up, I understand this is an
RFC and ecovec board file is not the real juice of this series ;)

Ping me if I can help with testing as I've the board.

Thanks
   j

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

> On Mar 17, 2018, at 6:25 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> Hi Jacopo,
>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
>>> Hello Dmitry
>>> 
>>> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
>>> 
>> 
>> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
>> old to me.
> 
> Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> user of...

Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t remove support for that.

The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.

Adrian

> 
>>> And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
>>> afraid.
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>>> Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
>>>> backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
>>>> comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
>>>> gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
>>>> events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
>>>> 
>>>> We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
>>>> in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
>>>> to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
>>>> above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
>>>> let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
>>>> present at all in DVI case.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
>>>> index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
>>>> @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
>>>> };
>>>> 
>>>> static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
>>>> -    .fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
>>>>    .gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
>>>>    .def_value = 1,
>>>>    .name = "backlight",
>>>> @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
>>>>    &usb1_common_device,
>>>>    &usbhs_device,
>>>>    &lcdc_device,
>>>> -    &gpio_backlight_device,
>>>>    &ceu0_device,
>>>>    &ceu1_device,
>>>>    &keysc_device,
>>>> @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>>>> {
>>>>    struct clk *clk;
>>>>    bool cn12_enabled = false;
>>>> +    bool use_backlight = false;
>>>> +    int error;
>>>> 
>>>>    /* register board specific self-refresh code */
>>>>    sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
>>>> @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>>>>        lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes        = ecovec_dvi_modes;
>>>>        lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes        = ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
>>>> 
>>>> -        /* No backlight */
>>>> -        gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
>>>> -
>>>>        gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
>>>>        gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
>>>>    } else {
>>>> @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>>>>        /* enable TouchScreen */
>>>>        i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
>>>>        irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
>>>> +
>>>> +        use_backlight = true;
>>>>    }
>>>> 
>>>>    /* enable CEU0 */
>>>> @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>>>>    gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
>>>> #endif
>>>> 
>>>> -    return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
>>>> -                    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
>>>> +    error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
>>>> +                      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
>>> 
>>> I would invert this.
>>> Register the backlight first, then all other devices.
>> 
>> We could do that, but why would that be better?
>> 
> 
> That if backlight device registration fails we do not register all
> other devices. But yes that may be a bit too harsh, isn't it?
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> +    if (error)
>>>> +        return error;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (use_backlight) {
>>>> +        error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
>>>> +        if (error)
>>>> +            pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
>>>> +                error);
>>> 
>>> Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
>> 
>> I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
>> here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
>> does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
>> one backlight.
> 
> You are very correct, sorry for the fuss.
> 
>> 
>>> are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.
>> 
>> I'll fix this.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Also, you may want to return error.
>> 
>> How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
>> registered devices on error adding backlight?
> 
> As the function returned an error code for 'platform_add_devices()' I
> thought we may want to return one as well. That's why I proposed to
> invert the registration order :)
> 
> All minor nits btw,  sorry for jumping up, I understand this is an
> RFC and ecovec board file is not the real juice of this series ;)
> 
> Ping me if I can help with testing as I've the board.
> 
> Thanks
>   j
> 
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dmitry
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

> On Mar 17, 2018, at 6:25 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> Hi Jacopo,
>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
>>> Hello Dmitry
>>> 
>>> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
>>> 
>> 
>> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
>> old to me.
> 
> Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> user of...

Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t remove support for that.

The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.

Adrian

> 
>>> And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
>>> afraid.
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>>> Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
>>>> backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
>>>> comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
>>>> gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
>>>> events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
>>>> 
>>>> We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
>>>> in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
>>>> to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
>>>> above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
>>>> let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
>>>> present at all in DVI case.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
>>>> index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
>>>> @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
>>>> };
>>>> 
>>>> static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
>>>> -    .fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
>>>>    .gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
>>>>    .def_value = 1,
>>>>    .name = "backlight",
>>>> @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
>>>>    &usb1_common_device,
>>>>    &usbhs_device,
>>>>    &lcdc_device,
>>>> -    &gpio_backlight_device,
>>>>    &ceu0_device,
>>>>    &ceu1_device,
>>>>    &keysc_device,
>>>> @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>>>> {
>>>>    struct clk *clk;
>>>>    bool cn12_enabled = false;
>>>> +    bool use_backlight = false;
>>>> +    int error;
>>>> 
>>>>    /* register board specific self-refresh code */
>>>>    sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
>>>> @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>>>>        lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes        = ecovec_dvi_modes;
>>>>        lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes        = ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
>>>> 
>>>> -        /* No backlight */
>>>> -        gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
>>>> -
>>>>        gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
>>>>        gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
>>>>    } else {
>>>> @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>>>>        /* enable TouchScreen */
>>>>        i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
>>>>        irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
>>>> +
>>>> +        use_backlight = true;
>>>>    }
>>>> 
>>>>    /* enable CEU0 */
>>>> @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
>>>>    gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
>>>> #endif
>>>> 
>>>> -    return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
>>>> -                    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
>>>> +    error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
>>>> +                      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
>>> 
>>> I would invert this.
>>> Register the backlight first, then all other devices.
>> 
>> We could do that, but why would that be better?
>> 
> 
> That if backlight device registration fails we do not register all
> other devices. But yes that may be a bit too harsh, isn't it?
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> +    if (error)
>>>> +        return error;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (use_backlight) {
>>>> +        error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
>>>> +        if (error)
>>>> +            pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
>>>> +                error);
>>> 
>>> Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
>> 
>> I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
>> here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
>> does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
>> one backlight.
> 
> You are very correct, sorry for the fuss.
> 
>> 
>>> are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.
>> 
>> I'll fix this.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Also, you may want to return error.
>> 
>> How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
>> registered devices on error adding backlight?
> 
> As the function returned an error code for 'platform_add_devices()' I
> thought we may want to return one as well. That's why I proposed to
> invert the registration order :)
> 
> All minor nits btw,  sorry for jumping up, I understand this is an
> RFC and ecovec board file is not the real juice of this series ;)
> 
> Ping me if I can help with testing as I've the board.
> 
> Thanks
>   j
> 
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dmitry
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Rich Felker]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 07:21:17PM +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Mar 17, 2018, at 6:25 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Dmitry,
> > 
> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >> Hi Jacopo,
> >> 
> >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >>> Hello Dmitry
> >>> 
> >>> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> >> old to me.
> > 
> > Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> > also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> > user of...
> 
> Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t
> remove support for that.
> 
> The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.

Thanks. At some point it would be nice to remove the board file, but
only once the conversion to device tree happens. If anyone has a list
of boards that people are still using or have access to and who can do
testing, it would be nice to compile that somewhere so we can figure
out what needs to be tested and who can test it.

Rich

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Rich Felker]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 07:21:17PM +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Mar 17, 2018, at 6:25 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Dmitry,
> > 
> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >> Hi Jacopo,
> >> 
> >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >>> Hello Dmitry
> >>> 
> >>> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> >> old to me.
> > 
> > Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> > also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> > user of...
> 
> Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t
> remove support for that.
> 
> The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.

Thanks. At some point it would be nice to remove the board file, but
only once the conversion to device tree happens. If anyone has a list
of boards that people are still using or have access to and who can do
testing, it would be nice to compile that somewhere so we can figure
out what needs to be tested and who can test it.

Rich

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 01:16:31PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 07:21:17PM +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > On Mar 17, 2018, at 6:25 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Dmitry,
> > > 
> > >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >> Hi Jacopo,
> > >> 
> > >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > >>> Hello Dmitry
> > >>> 
> > >>> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> > >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> > >>> 
> > >> 
> > >> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> > >> old to me.
> > > 
> > > Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> > > also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> > > user of...
> > 
> > Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t
> > remove support for that.
> > 
> > The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.
> 
> Thanks. At some point it would be nice to remove the board file, but
> only once the conversion to device tree happens. If anyone has a list
> of boards that people are still using or have access to and who can do
> testing, it would be nice to compile that somewhere so we can figure
> out what needs to be tested and who can test it.

For me I simply want to remove the custom "pen down" handler for tsc2007
from ecovec24. Unfortunately it seems with the current code you have to
switch from interrupt delivery to GPIO access on the board and it is not
really compatible with common handler and ecovec24 is the only board
that needs this custom handler support. If we can remove it then we can
switch the driver to use generic device properties only.

Note that the driver is still functional without the pendown handler, it
uses alternative methods for detecting lifting the pen, but they are
less reliable. I wonder how many people use ecovec24 with the
touchscreen.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 01:16:31PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 07:21:17PM +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > On Mar 17, 2018, at 6:25 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Dmitry,
> > > 
> > >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >> Hi Jacopo,
> > >> 
> > >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > >>> Hello Dmitry
> > >>> 
> > >>> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> > >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> > >>> 
> > >> 
> > >> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> > >> old to me.
> > > 
> > > Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> > > also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> > > user of...
> > 
> > Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t
> > remove support for that.
> > 
> > The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.
> 
> Thanks. At some point it would be nice to remove the board file, but
> only once the conversion to device tree happens. If anyone has a list
> of boards that people are still using or have access to and who can do
> testing, it would be nice to compile that somewhere so we can figure
> out what needs to be tested and who can test it.

For me I simply want to remove the custom "pen down" handler for tsc2007
from ecovec24. Unfortunately it seems with the current code you have to
switch from interrupt delivery to GPIO access on the board and it is not
really compatible with common handler and ecovec24 is the only board
that needs this custom handler support. If we can remove it then we can
switch the driver to use generic device properties only.

Note that the driver is still functional without the pendown handler, it
uses alternative methods for detecting lifting the pen, but they are
less reliable. I wonder how many people use ecovec24 with the
touchscreen.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:25:16AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Jacopo,
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > > Hello Dmitry
> > > 
> > > FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> > > 
> > 
> > What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> > old to me.
> 
> Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> user of...
> 
> > > And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
> > > afraid.
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> > > > backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> > > > comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> > > > gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> > > > events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
> > > >
> > > > We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> > > > in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> > > > to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> > > > above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> > > > let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> > > > present at all in DVI case.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > > >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > > index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > > @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> > > > -	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
> > > >  	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> > > >  	.def_value = 1,
> > > >  	.name = "backlight",
> > > > @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
> > > >  	&usb1_common_device,
> > > >  	&usbhs_device,
> > > >  	&lcdc_device,
> > > > -	&gpio_backlight_device,
> > > >  	&ceu0_device,
> > > >  	&ceu1_device,
> > > >  	&keysc_device,
> > > > @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct clk *clk;
> > > >  	bool cn12_enabled = false;
> > > > +	bool use_backlight = false;
> > > > +	int error;
> > > >
> > > >  	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
> > > >  	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> > > > @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > > >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
> > > >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
> > > >
> > > > -		/* No backlight */
> > > > -		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> > > > -
> > > >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
> > > >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
> > > >  	} else {
> > > > @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > > >  		/* enable TouchScreen */
> > > >  		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
> > > >  		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> > > > +
> > > > +		use_backlight = true;
> > > >  	}
> > > >
> > > >  	/* enable CEU0 */
> > > > @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > > >  	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
> > > >  #endif
> > > >
> > > > -	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > > > -				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > > > +	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > > > +				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > > 
> > > I would invert this.
> > > Register the backlight first, then all other devices.
> > 
> > We could do that, but why would that be better?
> > 
> 
> That if backlight device registration fails we do not register all
> other devices. But yes that may be a bit too harsh, isn't it?

Yes, that was my reasoning. With platform_add_devices() that unwinds all
the devices it created successfully we do not really have any option but
return error (which is either ignored or fatal). Here we can simply warn
and still let the device boot so users have easier way to see what went
wrong.

> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > +	if (error)
> > > > +		return error;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (use_backlight) {
> > > > +		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> > > > +		if (error)
> > > > +			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> > > > +				error);
> > > 
> > > Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
> > 
> > I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
> > here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
> > does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
> > one backlight.
> 
> You are very correct, sorry for the fuss.
> 
> > 
> > > are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.
> > 
> > I'll fix this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also, you may want to return error.
> > 
> > How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
> > registered devices on error adding backlight?
> 
> As the function returned an error code for 'platform_add_devices()' I
> thought we may want to return one as well. That's why I proposed to
> invert the registration order :)
> 
> All minor nits btw,  sorry for jumping up, I understand this is an
> RFC and ecovec board file is not the real juice of this series ;)
> 
> Ping me if I can help with testing as I've the board.

Yes, I'll fix up the other mess ups and I'll post a v2.

Thanks!

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:25:16AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Jacopo,
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > > Hello Dmitry
> > > 
> > > FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> > > 
> > 
> > What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> > old to me.
> 
> Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> user of...
> 
> > > And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
> > > afraid.
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> > > > backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> > > > comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> > > > gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> > > > events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
> > > >
> > > > We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> > > > in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> > > > to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> > > > above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> > > > let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> > > > present at all in DVI case.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > > >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > > index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> > > > @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> > > > -	.fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
> > > >  	.gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> > > >  	.def_value = 1,
> > > >  	.name = "backlight",
> > > > @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
> > > >  	&usb1_common_device,
> > > >  	&usbhs_device,
> > > >  	&lcdc_device,
> > > > -	&gpio_backlight_device,
> > > >  	&ceu0_device,
> > > >  	&ceu1_device,
> > > >  	&keysc_device,
> > > > @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct clk *clk;
> > > >  	bool cn12_enabled = false;
> > > > +	bool use_backlight = false;
> > > > +	int error;
> > > >
> > > >  	/* register board specific self-refresh code */
> > > >  	sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> > > > @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > > >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes		= ecovec_dvi_modes;
> > > >  		lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes		= ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
> > > >
> > > > -		/* No backlight */
> > > > -		gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> > > > -
> > > >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
> > > >  		gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
> > > >  	} else {
> > > > @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > > >  		/* enable TouchScreen */
> > > >  		i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
> > > >  		irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> > > > +
> > > > +		use_backlight = true;
> > > >  	}
> > > >
> > > >  	/* enable CEU0 */
> > > > @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> > > >  	gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
> > > >  #endif
> > > >
> > > > -	return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > > > -				    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > > > +	error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> > > > +				      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> > > 
> > > I would invert this.
> > > Register the backlight first, then all other devices.
> > 
> > We could do that, but why would that be better?
> > 
> 
> That if backlight device registration fails we do not register all
> other devices. But yes that may be a bit too harsh, isn't it?

Yes, that was my reasoning. With platform_add_devices() that unwinds all
the devices it created successfully we do not really have any option but
return error (which is either ignored or fatal). Here we can simply warn
and still let the device boot so users have easier way to see what went
wrong.

> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > +	if (error)
> > > > +		return error;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (use_backlight) {
> > > > +		error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> > > > +		if (error)
> > > > +			pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> > > > +				error);
> > > 
> > > Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
> > 
> > I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
> > here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
> > does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
> > one backlight.
> 
> You are very correct, sorry for the fuss.
> 
> > 
> > > are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.
> > 
> > I'll fix this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also, you may want to return error.
> > 
> > How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
> > registered devices on error adding backlight?
> 
> As the function returned an error code for 'platform_add_devices()' I
> thought we may want to return one as well. That's why I proposed to
> invert the registration order :)
> 
> All minor nits btw,  sorry for jumping up, I understand this is an
> RFC and ecovec board file is not the real juice of this series ;)
> 
> Ping me if I can help with testing as I've the board.

Yes, I'll fix up the other mess ups and I'll post a v2.

Thanks!

-- 
Dmitry

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

On 03/18/2018 02:16 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t
>> remove support for that.
>>
>> The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.
> 
> Thanks. At some point it would be nice to remove the board file, but
> only once the conversion to device tree happens. If anyone has a list
> of boards that people are still using or have access to and who can do
> testing, it would be nice to compile that somewhere so we can figure
> out what needs to be tested and who can test it.

We should maybe create a wiki page somewhere. Either in the kernel wiki
(I don't have an account for that) or the Debian Wiki.

Here's what I still use:

- Renesas SH7724 Evovec
- Renesas SH7786LCR Evaluation Board
- LANDISK SH7751
- Sega Dreamcast (although I currently don't use that)
- NextVoD (currently not in the kernel)

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

On 03/18/2018 02:16 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t
>> remove support for that.
>>
>> The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.
> 
> Thanks. At some point it would be nice to remove the board file, but
> only once the conversion to device tree happens. If anyone has a list
> of boards that people are still using or have access to and who can do
> testing, it would be nice to compile that somewhere so we can figure
> out what needs to be tested and who can test it.

We should maybe create a wiki page somewhere. Either in the kernel wiki
(I don't have an account for that) or the Debian Wiki.

Here's what I still use:

- Renesas SH7724 Evovec
- Renesas SH7786LCR Evaluation Board
- LANDISK SH7751
- Sega Dreamcast (although I currently don't use that)
- NextVoD (currently not in the kernel)

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[jacopo mondi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6956 bytes --]

Hi Andrian,

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 07:21:17PM +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 17, 2018, at 6:25 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >> Hi Jacopo,
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >>> Hello Dmitry
> >>>
> >>> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> >>>
> >>
> >> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> >> old to me.
> >
> > Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> > also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> > user of...
>
> Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t remove support for that.
>
> The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.

Sorry if I was not clear here, it is not anyone's intention to remove any
support for any SH board. The media subsystem is working to replace
some components (the legacy camera drivers) a few SH boards (ecovec
included) are the only remaining user of. Nobody is working to remove
support for those boards.

I have access to a few SH boards, if you're planning to collect that
informations in some wiki, I'll list myself there.

Thanks
   j

>
> Adrian
>
> >
> >>> And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
> >>> afraid.
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>>> Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> >>>> backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> >>>> comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> >>>> gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> >>>> events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
> >>>>
> >>>> We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> >>>> in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> >>>> to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> >>>> above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> >>>> let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> >>>> present at all in DVI case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> >>>> index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> >>>> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> >>>> @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> >>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>> static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> >>>> -    .fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
> >>>>    .gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> >>>>    .def_value = 1,
> >>>>    .name = "backlight",
> >>>> @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
> >>>>    &usb1_common_device,
> >>>>    &usbhs_device,
> >>>>    &lcdc_device,
> >>>> -    &gpio_backlight_device,
> >>>>    &ceu0_device,
> >>>>    &ceu1_device,
> >>>>    &keysc_device,
> >>>> @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >>>> {
> >>>>    struct clk *clk;
> >>>>    bool cn12_enabled = false;
> >>>> +    bool use_backlight = false;
> >>>> +    int error;
> >>>>
> >>>>    /* register board specific self-refresh code */
> >>>>    sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> >>>> @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >>>>        lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes        = ecovec_dvi_modes;
> >>>>        lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes        = ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
> >>>>
> >>>> -        /* No backlight */
> >>>> -        gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> >>>> -
> >>>>        gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
> >>>>        gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
> >>>>    } else {
> >>>> @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >>>>        /* enable TouchScreen */
> >>>>        i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
> >>>>        irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +        use_backlight = true;
> >>>>    }
> >>>>
> >>>>    /* enable CEU0 */
> >>>> @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >>>>    gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
> >>>> #endif
> >>>>
> >>>> -    return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> >>>> -                    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> >>>> +    error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> >>>> +                      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> >>>
> >>> I would invert this.
> >>> Register the backlight first, then all other devices.
> >>
> >> We could do that, but why would that be better?
> >>
> >
> > That if backlight device registration fails we do not register all
> > other devices. But yes that may be a bit too harsh, isn't it?
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> +    if (error)
> >>>> +        return error;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +    if (use_backlight) {
> >>>> +        error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> >>>> +        if (error)
> >>>> +            pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> >>>> +                error);
> >>>
> >>> Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
> >>
> >> I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
> >> here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
> >> does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
> >> one backlight.
> >
> > You are very correct, sorry for the fuss.
> >
> >>
> >>> are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.
> >>
> >> I'll fix this.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Also, you may want to return error.
> >>
> >> How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
> >> registered devices on error adding backlight?
> >
> > As the function returned an error code for 'platform_add_devices()' I
> > thought we may want to return one as well. That's why I proposed to
> > invert the registration order :)
> >
> > All minor nits btw,  sorry for jumping up, I understand this is an
> > RFC and ecovec board file is not the real juice of this series ;)
> >
> > Ping me if I can help with testing as I've the board.
> >
> > Thanks
> >   j
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dmitry
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[jacopo mondi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6956 bytes --]

Hi Andrian,

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 07:21:17PM +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 17, 2018, at 6:25 PM, jacopo mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 04:38:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >> Hi Jacopo,
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:07:48AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >>> Hello Dmitry
> >>>
> >>> FYI I am brushing the ecovec board these days as well
> >>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg52536.html
> >>>
> >>
> >> What is the ecovec board BTW? Is it some devkit or what? It seems quite
> >> old to me.
> >
> > Yes, it is a SuperH 4 based development board. It is old for sure. I'm
> > also working on removing some stuff the ecovec board file is the only
> > user of...
>
> Umh, but I’m still using the SH7724 Evovec board. Please don’t remove support for that.
>
> The SuperH port of the Linux kernel is still maintained.

Sorry if I was not clear here, it is not anyone's intention to remove any
support for any SH board. The media subsystem is working to replace
some components (the legacy camera drivers) a few SH boards (ecovec
included) are the only remaining user of. Nobody is working to remove
support for those boards.

I have access to a few SH boards, if you're planning to collect that
informations in some wiki, I'll list myself there.

Thanks
   j

>
> Adrian
>
> >
> >>> And I have a board to test with but without any display panel, I'm
> >>> afraid.
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:42:00PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >>>> Commit fe79f919f47e ("sh: ecovec24: Use gpio-backlight") removed custom
> >>>> backlight support and switched over to generic gpio-backlight driver. The
> >>>> comment when we run with DVI states "no backlight", but setting
> >>>> gpio_backlight_data.fbdev to NULL actually makes gpio-backlight to react to
> >>>> events from any framebuffer device, not ignore them.
> >>>>
> >>>> We want to get rid of platform data in favor of generic device properties
> >>>> in gpio_backlight driver, so we can not have kernel pointers passed around
> >>>> to tie the framebuffer device to backlight. Assuming that the intent of the
> >>>> above referenced commit was to indeed not export backlight when using DVI,
> >>>> let's switch to conditionally registering backlight device so it is not
> >>>> present at all in DVI case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> >>>> index 6f929abe0b50f..67633d2d42390 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> >>>> +++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> >>>> @@ -368,7 +368,6 @@ static struct platform_device lcdc_device = {
> >>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>> static struct gpio_backlight_platform_data gpio_backlight_data = {
> >>>> -    .fbdev = &lcdc_device.dev,
> >>>>    .gpio = GPIO_PTR1,
> >>>>    .def_value = 1,
> >>>>    .name = "backlight",
> >>>> @@ -987,7 +986,6 @@ static struct platform_device *ecovec_devices[] __initdata = {
> >>>>    &usb1_common_device,
> >>>>    &usbhs_device,
> >>>>    &lcdc_device,
> >>>> -    &gpio_backlight_device,
> >>>>    &ceu0_device,
> >>>>    &ceu1_device,
> >>>>    &keysc_device,
> >>>> @@ -1077,6 +1075,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >>>> {
> >>>>    struct clk *clk;
> >>>>    bool cn12_enabled = false;
> >>>> +    bool use_backlight = false;
> >>>> +    int error;
> >>>>
> >>>>    /* register board specific self-refresh code */
> >>>>    sh_mobile_register_self_refresh(SUSP_SH_STANDBY | SUSP_SH_SF |
> >>>> @@ -1193,9 +1193,6 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >>>>        lcdc_info.ch[0].lcd_modes        = ecovec_dvi_modes;
> >>>>        lcdc_info.ch[0].num_modes        = ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_dvi_modes);
> >>>>
> >>>> -        /* No backlight */
> >>>> -        gpio_backlight_data.fbdev = NULL;
> >>>> -
> >>>>        gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTA2, 1);
> >>>>        gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTU1, 1);
> >>>>    } else {
> >>>> @@ -1217,6 +1214,8 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >>>>        /* enable TouchScreen */
> >>>>        i2c_register_board_info(0, &ts_i2c_clients, 1);
> >>>>        irq_set_irq_type(IRQ0, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +        use_backlight = true;
> >>>>    }
> >>>>
> >>>>    /* enable CEU0 */
> >>>> @@ -1431,8 +1430,19 @@ static int __init arch_setup(void)
> >>>>    gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTG4, 1);
> >>>> #endif
> >>>>
> >>>> -    return platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> >>>> -                    ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> >>>> +    error = platform_add_devices(ecovec_devices,
> >>>> +                      ARRAY_SIZE(ecovec_devices));
> >>>
> >>> I would invert this.
> >>> Register the backlight first, then all other devices.
> >>
> >> We could do that, but why would that be better?
> >>
> >
> > That if backlight device registration fails we do not register all
> > other devices. But yes that may be a bit too harsh, isn't it?
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> +    if (error)
> >>>> +        return error;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +    if (use_backlight) {
> >>>> +        error = platform_device_add(&gpio_backlight_device);
> >>>> +        if (error)
> >>>> +            pr_warn("%s: failed to register backlight: %d\n",
> >>>> +                error);
> >>>
> >>> Could you use dev_warn here? Also the format is wrong, I assume you
> >>
> >> I would rather not, as the backlight device would be in unknown state
> >> here, and using dev_warn with device that has not been fully registered
> >> does not give any benefits. There is also no ambiguity as there is only
> >> one backlight.
> >
> > You are very correct, sorry for the fuss.
> >
> >>
> >>> are missing a '__func__' as second function argument.
> >>
> >> I'll fix this.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Also, you may want to return error.
> >>
> >> How would caller handle this error? Should we kill all successfully
> >> registered devices on error adding backlight?
> >
> > As the function returned an error code for 'platform_add_devices()' I
> > thought we may want to return one as well. That's why I proposed to
> > invert the registration order :)
> >
> > All minor nits btw,  sorry for jumping up, I understand this is an
> > RFC and ecovec board file is not the real juice of this series ;)
> >
> > Ping me if I can help with testing as I've the board.
> >
> > Thanks
> >   j
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dmitry
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Jacopo!

On 03/18/2018 07:54 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Sorry if I was not clear here, it is not anyone's intention to remove any support for any SH board. The media subsystem is working to replace some
> components (the legacy camera drivers) a few SH boards (ecovec included) are the only remaining user of. Nobody is working to remove support for those
> boards.

Ok, I am very relieved to hear that. I have invested a lot of work and
effort into Debian's SuperH port and I therefore hope we can still
keep it for a while.

FWIW, I will send out free ST-40 SuperH development boxes to anyone
who is is willing to work on the SH kernel :-).

> I have access to a few SH boards, if you're planning to collect that informations in some wiki, I'll list myself there.

I'll find the proper wiki to post this information. I need to figure
out what I need to get an account for the kernel.org wiki.

Adrian

- -- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEYv+KdYTgKVaVRgAGdCY7N/W1+RMFAlquSYcACgkQdCY7N/W1
+RPkZBAAt2dXvx99JoE/X2O3Gsg+v5w682u/bglBBN+IBtFtlE4ARMBrJnyd9I7L
x/a0pDsEBuU1AIy2I6gcLc84ekd1A42qfsh4pISXKhMfDFFVBsxhbk0wbH7tyAqk
EWI7aQsBUVrrDl4pn0CRy0tirRBBabG6U+AiVYVdrxbNBKVMrQlfwf+Y1Ez7fAsP
3gEet5qNYJsQ0ofzQIXIr6i/sXYPL+rovPIRIBsvuvmmaGGvKmbe8PgFehcX1dbj
uPij8bgvfrEcT85hOi3MoCnBd5o1vEbtvfh5aBK4DIIZaAKMXmhDS0fhgQEYerv2
EaxzPkdMmhbd8N5T/DcIbaCoVPPDDDn/PFK1hSwN/lpL4n7ouQPjjA87qwPLbX7o
vfyoAsohtp1qKtepbp+x5CfjCwqeWu7qzaxjUF3tzAorH+wUUDsOKn2dKGHv7Vlr
LtE+IdO2eJPzZpcmZ0e86bn0YNk7ZtVmDMhdyUfbkI4ZkrO3ANJz4Ed+9vJPzAo7
YKZXI1DHJSd33bpAUtNE1Os9DMLqpuMIYxxGPENhEwcvVo5Ftix8NkviHbQxwLbY
GH36VySCqzkYSt6HUavv5W+N9v4T24pvHx9r+D4f6ACiMT17OtVwS5PMjPcARM5/
Ftp3D9JX8ZRMpktGMuUx18Hhm9wnAwhXK28vFoq6u5TLvVkmnu8=2O6i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [RFC 2/4] sh: ecovec24: conditionally register backlight device

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Jacopo!

On 03/18/2018 07:54 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Sorry if I was not clear here, it is not anyone's intention to remove any support for any SH board. The media subsystem is working to replace some
> components (the legacy camera drivers) a few SH boards (ecovec included) are the only remaining user of. Nobody is working to remove support for those
> boards.

Ok, I am very relieved to hear that. I have invested a lot of work and
effort into Debian's SuperH port and I therefore hope we can still
keep it for a while.

FWIW, I will send out free ST-40 SuperH development boxes to anyone
who is is willing to work on the SH kernel :-).

> I have access to a few SH boards, if you're planning to collect that informations in some wiki, I'll list myself there.

I'll find the proper wiki to post this information. I need to figure
out what I need to get an account for the kernel.org wiki.

Adrian

- -- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2O6i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [RFC 1/4] backlight: gpio_backlight: use generic device properties

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Instead of using of_property_read_bool() switch to using
> device_property_read_bool() This will allow switching from platform data to
> device properties everywhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [RFC 1/4] backlight: gpio_backlight: use generic device properties

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Instead of using of_property_read_bool() switch to using
> device_property_read_bool() This will allow switching from platform data to
> device properties everywhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [RFC 4/4] backlight: gpio_backlight: remove platform data support

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Legacy boards can use static property sets/GPIO lookup tables to describe
> backlight connections, there is no need to maintain legacy platform data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Good riddance, this is how all drivers should eventually end up
after full device property conversion I guess.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [RFC 4/4] backlight: gpio_backlight: remove platform data support

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Legacy boards can use static property sets/GPIO lookup tables to describe
> backlight connections, there is no need to maintain legacy platform data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Good riddance, this is how all drivers should eventually end up
after full device property conversion I guess.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [RFC 0/4] gpio-backlight: remove platform data support

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> This series attempts to remove platform data support from gpio_blackllist
> driver

We really need a GPIO blacklist driver in the kernel, but for
not let's fix backlight :D :D

> and switch it over to generic device properties/GPIO tables.

This series:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

> Please note that I do not have the hardware (do we even care about
> ecovec24? I'd like to rip out platform data support from tsc2007 as
> well, but ecovec24 is using custom pendown handler and GPIOs have
> to be switched off from interrupt mode to GPIO and back in that
> pendown handler, which is all quite messy. If we do not care about
> this board I'd much rather removed that custom pendown).

I am also struggling with refactoring of board files, all over the place.
At least Arnd deleted the Blackfin stuff now, but the misc ARM board
and MIPS stuff still give me the creeps sometimes.

I guess if maintainers of the boards are not there to even ACK
patches we can propose patches to simply delete them.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [RFC 0/4] gpio-backlight: remove platform data support

[Linus Walleij]

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> This series attempts to remove platform data support from gpio_blackllist
> driver

We really need a GPIO blacklist driver in the kernel, but for
not let's fix backlight :D :D

> and switch it over to generic device properties/GPIO tables.

This series:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

> Please note that I do not have the hardware (do we even care about
> ecovec24? I'd like to rip out platform data support from tsc2007 as
> well, but ecovec24 is using custom pendown handler and GPIOs have
> to be switched off from interrupt mode to GPIO and back in that
> pendown handler, which is all quite messy. If we do not care about
> this board I'd much rather removed that custom pendown).

I am also struggling with refactoring of board files, all over the place.
At least Arnd deleted the Blackfin stuff now, but the misc ARM board
and MIPS stuff still give me the creeps sometimes.

I guess if maintainers of the boards are not there to even ACK
patches we can propose patches to simply delete them.

Yours,
Linus Walleij