On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 05:13:58PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:47:41PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > >> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 02:10:21PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > >> >> This bug is actively happening several times per day, if such bug is > > >> >> closed syzbot will open another bug on the next crash. > > >> >> This bug has a reproducer, why do you think it is invalid? > > >> > > > >> > I tried to reproduce it on latest rdma-next and failed, so wanted to > > >> > start from clean page and see if it is still relevant. > > >> > > >> Ah, I see. > > >> You can now see the current status on dashboard: > > >> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=d4ac7bfeafac8a3d6d06123e078462ac765415e7 > > >> Yes, it still happens. > > >> > > >> syzbot has already reported another incarnation of this bug, you can > > >> see the link to dashboard in the email: > > >> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8d5eb964e412cfd2678 > > >> and it contains a link to the first version with reproducer. > > >> > > >> > Does it still reproduce on latest rdma-next? > > >> > > >> syzbot does not test rdma-next. > > >> > > >> But can you reproduce it on upstream tree where syzbot hits it? Just > > >> to make sure, you have ODEBUG enabled, right? > > > > > > Thanks for the tip, I added more debug options and returned to try the > > > repro on clean v4.16-rc1, it looks like I still don't have all needed > > > config options (SELinux). > > > > > > mount(selinuxfs) failed (errno 2) > > > > > > It seems that you have old syzkaller sources, it now explicitly does > > not fail on ENOENT: > > > > // selinux mount used to be at /selinux, but then moved to /sys/fs/selinux. > > const char* selinux_path = "./syz-tmp/newroot/selinux"; > > if (mount("/selinux", selinux_path, NULL, mount_flags, NULL)) { > > if (errno != ENOENT) > > fail("mount(/selinux) failed"); > > if (mount("/sys/fs/selinux", selinux_path, NULL, mount_flags, > > NULL) && errno != ENOENT) > > fail("mount(/sys/fs/selinux) failed"); > > } > > > > > > > Can you please cancel my email that closes this bug? > > > > There is no such option. The new bug is already created: > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6ecd3fdba0501c8843300056375abea0880816d2 > > now if we open the old one, we now have 2 for the same root cause. It > > will lead to mess. > > Still no luck, I'll leave this bug for now. So, except this bug, everything else is fixed. Thanks > > Thanks