From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756794AbeDBUcp (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2018 16:32:45 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:58464 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756412AbeDBUco (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2018 16:32:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 22:32:32 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Peter Rosin Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Richard Weinberger , Cyrille Pitchen , Nicolas Ferre , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Josh Wu , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: atmel: add module param to avoid using dma Message-ID: <20180402223232.6213f409@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20180402222020.1d344c14@bbrezillon> References: <20180329131054.22506-1-peda@axentia.se> <20180329153322.5e2fc1e7@bbrezillon> <20180329154416.5c1a0013@bbrezillon> <20180402142249.7e076a64@bbrezillon> <20180402212843.164d5d21@bbrezillon> <20180402222020.1d344c14@bbrezillon> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 22:20:20 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > And > > > which DDR slave is the target? 7, 8, 9 or 10? More than one? > > > > This, I don't know. I guess all of them can be used. > > Looks like I was wrong. According to "Table 15-3. SAMA5D3 Master to > Slave Access", LCDC port 0 can only access DDR port 2 and LCDC port 1 > can only access DDR port 3. > > Can you try to write 0x3 to 0xFFFFECCC and 0x30 to 0xFFFFECD4? > Oh, one more thing. Changing the priority won't necessarily solve your problem because of that: " If more than one master requests the slave bus, regardless of the respective masters priorities, no master will be granted the slave bus for two consecutive runs. A master can only get back-to-back grants so long as it is the only requesting master. " To solve that, you'll have to play with MATRIX_MCFGy.ULBT (make sure DMAC0 and DMAC1 have a small enough ULBT that is not 0) or MATRIX_SCFGx.SLOT_CYCLE (that one is probably harder to get right since it's expressed in AHB clock cycles). -- Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 22:32:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: raw: atmel: add module param to avoid using dma In-Reply-To: <20180402222020.1d344c14@bbrezillon> References: <20180329131054.22506-1-peda@axentia.se> <20180329153322.5e2fc1e7@bbrezillon> <20180329154416.5c1a0013@bbrezillon> <20180402142249.7e076a64@bbrezillon> <20180402212843.164d5d21@bbrezillon> <20180402222020.1d344c14@bbrezillon> Message-ID: <20180402223232.6213f409@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 22:20:20 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > And > > > which DDR slave is the target? 7, 8, 9 or 10? More than one? > > > > This, I don't know. I guess all of them can be used. > > Looks like I was wrong. According to "Table 15-3. SAMA5D3 Master to > Slave Access", LCDC port 0 can only access DDR port 2 and LCDC port 1 > can only access DDR port 3. > > Can you try to write 0x3 to 0xFFFFECCC and 0x30 to 0xFFFFECD4? > Oh, one more thing. Changing the priority won't necessarily solve your problem because of that: " If more than one master requests the slave bus, regardless of the respective masters priorities, no master will be granted the slave bus for two consecutive runs. A master can only get back-to-back grants so long as it is the only requesting master. " To solve that, you'll have to play with MATRIX_MCFGy.ULBT (make sure DMAC0 and DMAC1 have a small enough ULBT that is not 0) or MATRIX_SCFGx.SLOT_CYCLE (that one is probably harder to get right since it's expressed in AHB clock cycles). -- Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com