From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751414AbeDDOLz (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:11:55 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41718 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751213AbeDDOLy (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:11:54 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D21D22133F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:11:49 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Michal Hocko Cc: Zhaoyang Huang , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patch-test@lists.linaro.org, Andrew Morton , Joel Fernandes , linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel/trace:check the val against the available mem Message-ID: <20180404101149.08f6f881@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180404062340.GD6312@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1522320104-6573-1-git-send-email-zhaoyang.huang@spreadtrum.com> <20180330102038.2378925b@gandalf.local.home> <20180403110612.GM5501@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180403075158.0c0a2795@gandalf.local.home> <20180403121614.GV5501@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180403082348.28cd3c1c@gandalf.local.home> <20180403123514.GX5501@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180403093245.43e7e77c@gandalf.local.home> <20180403135607.GC5501@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180404062340.GD6312@dhcp22.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:23:40 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > If you are afraid of that then you can have a look at {set,clear}_current_oom_origin() > which will automatically select the current process as an oom victim and > kill it. Would it even receive the signal? Does alloc_pages_node() even respond to signals? Because the OOM happens while the allocation loop is running. I tried it out, I did the following: set_current_oom_origin(); for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) { struct page *page; /* * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL flag makes sure that the allocation fails * gracefully without invoking oom-killer and the system is not * destabilized. */ bpage = kzalloc_node(ALIGN(sizeof(*bpage), cache_line_size()), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, cpu_to_node(cpu)); if (!bpage) goto free_pages; list_add(&bpage->list, pages); page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, 0); if (!page) goto free_pages; bpage->page = page_address(page); rb_init_page(bpage->page); } clear_current_oom_origin(); The first time I ran my ring buffer memory stress test, it killed the stress test. The second time I ran it, it killed polkitd. Still doesn't help as much as the original patch. You haven't convinced me that using si_mem_available() is a bad idea. If anything, you've solidified my confidence in it. -- Steve