From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50390 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751165AbeDEGvq (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2018 02:51:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 08:51:45 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Sasha Levin Cc: Finn Thain , Geert Uytterhoeven , Laurent Vivier , Jens Axboe , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] SWIM driver fixes Message-ID: <20180405065145.GE5877@kroah.com> References: <20180405063010.GB5431@kroah.com> <20180405064005.GM7561@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180405064005.GM7561@sasha-vm> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 06:40:06AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:30:10AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:33:35AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> Hi Finn Thain. > >> > >> [This is an automated email] > >> > >> This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined > >> to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 3.6525) > >> > >> The bot has tested the following trees: v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126, > >> > >> v4.15.15: Build OK! > >> v4.14.32: Build OK! > >> v4.9.92: Build OK! > >> v4.4.126: Build OK! > >> > >> Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree. > > > >Did this bot respond to the whole series here, or the 00/12 patch? :) > > I'm experimenting with an idea that involves squashing a series of > commits into a single commit and running it through the NN that way. > > I figured it might make sense since when people mail patches this way > there's usually dependencies between them, so if a random patch in the > series got tagged for stable, we'll need to bring in the rest of the > series as well. > > So yes, in this case the entire series was identified by the NN as > stable material. You can also see that there are separate mails for > individual patches in the series - they acts as a sort of a fallback > saying "maybe you don't want the whole series, but consider these > as individual patches" (also gives a hint as to why the entire series > was selected). Ah, very nice stuff! Thanks for the explaination. greg k-h