From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751425AbeDEIKT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 5 Apr 2018 04:10:19 -0400
Received: from lgeamrelo13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:39376 "EHLO
        lgeamrelo13.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751249AbeDEIKQ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 5 Apr 2018 04:10:16 -0400
X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.151
X-Original-MAILFROM: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.142
X-Original-MAILFROM: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 17:10:13 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/thp: don't count ZONE_MOVABLE as the target for
 freepage reserving
Message-ID: <20180405081013.GB631@js1304-desktop>
References: <1522913236-15776-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
 <20180405075753.GZ6312@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180405080539.GA631@js1304-desktop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180405080539.GA631@js1304-desktop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:05:39PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:57:53AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 05-04-18 16:27:16, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > > 
> > > ZONE_MOVABLE only has movable pages so we don't need to keep enough
> > > freepages to avoid or deal with fragmentation. So, don't count it.
> > > 
> > > This changes min_free_kbytes and thus min_watermark greatly
> > > if ZONE_MOVABLE is used. It will make the user uses more memory.

Oops.. s/more/less

> > 
> > OK, but why does it matter. Has anybody seen this as an issue?
> 
> There was a regression report for CMA patchset and I think that it is
> related to this problem. CMA patchset makes the system uses one more
> zone (ZONE_MOVABLE) and then increase min_free_kbytes. It reduces
> usable memory and it could cause regression.
> 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180102063528.GG30397@yexl-desktop

Thanks.