From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751445AbeDEP4g (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:56:36 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:51550 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751195AbeDEP4f (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:56:35 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48Y6AVxhmsyplca8DPATKZBjZI4wbYpjoxRcVyF5V1CcdSoOkmUS/2Kavk/vdOK6II7Ads3Zw==
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 18:55:51 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: consider non-anonymous thp as unmovable page
Message-ID: <20180405155551.wchleyaf4rxooj6m@node.shutemov.name>
References: <1522730788-24530-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
 <20180403075928.GC5501@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180403082405.GA23809@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
 <20180403083451.GG5501@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180403105411.hknofkbn6rzs26oz@node.shutemov.name>
 <20180405085927.GC6312@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180405122838.6a6b35psizem4tcy@node.shutemov.name>
 <20180405124830.GJ6312@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20180405134045.7axuun6d7ufobzj4@node.shutemov.name>
 <20180405150547.GN6312@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180405150547.GN6312@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 05-04-18 16:40:45, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:48:30PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > RIght, I confused the two. What is the proper layer to fix that then?
> > > rmap_walk_file?
> > 
> > Maybe something like this? Totally untested.
> 
> This looks way too complex. Why cannot we simply split THP page cache
> during migration?

This way we unify the codepath for archictures that don't support THP
migration and shmem THP.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov