From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Michael Henders <hendersm@shaw.ca>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2] resource: Fix integer overflow at reallocation Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:20:26 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180408072026.27365-1-tiwai@suse.de> (raw) We've got a bug report indicating a kernel panic at booting on an x86-32 system, and it turned out to be the invalid resource assigned after PCI resource reallocation. __find_resource() first aligns the resource start address and resets the end address with start+size-1 accordingly, then checks whether it's contained. Here the end address may overflow the integer, although resource_contains() still returns true because the function validates only start and end address. So this ends up with returning an invalid resource (start > end). There was already an attempt to cover such a problem in the commit 47ea91b4052d ("Resource: fix wrong resource window calculation"), but this case is an overseen one. This patch adds the validity check in resource_contains() to see whether the given resource has a valid range for avoiding the integer overflow problem. Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1086739 Fixes: 23c570a67448 ("resource: ability to resize an allocated resource") Reported-and-tested-by: Michael Henders <hendersm@shaw.ca> Reviewed-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> --- Andrew, could you pick this? It's still in a wild west... Thanks! v1->v2: check in resource_contains() instead of in __find_resource() include/linux/ioport.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h index da0ebaec25f0..466d7be046eb 100644 --- a/include/linux/ioport.h +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h @@ -212,6 +212,9 @@ static inline bool resource_contains(struct resource *r1, struct resource *r2) return false; if (r1->flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET || r2->flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET) return false; + /* sanity check whether it's a valid resource range */ + if (r2->end < r2->start) + return false; return r1->start <= r2->start && r1->end >= r2->end; } -- 2.16.3
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-08 7:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-04-08 7:20 Takashi Iwai [this message] 2018-04-10 0:23 ` Andrew Morton 2018-04-10 4:54 ` Takashi Iwai 2018-04-10 20:42 ` Andrew Morton 2018-04-11 0:37 ` Ram Pai 2018-04-11 6:16 ` Takashi Iwai 2018-04-11 14:08 ` Ram Pai
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180408072026.27365-1-tiwai@suse.de \ --to=tiwai@suse.de \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=hendersm@shaw.ca \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2] resource: Fix integer overflow at reallocation' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.