All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: saeedm@mellanox.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] net: net-porcfs: Reduce rcu lock critical section
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:16:49 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410.131649.583776764903333305.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180410170812.18905-1-saeedm@mellanox.com>

From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:08:11 -0700

> The current net proc fs sequence file implementation to show current
> namespace netdevs list statistics and mc lists holds the rcu lock
> throughout the whole process, from dev seq start up to dev seq stop.
> 
> This is really greedy and demanding from device drivers since
> ndo_get_stats64 called from dev_seq_show while the rcu lock is held.
> 
> The rcu lock is needed to guarantee that device chain is not modified
> while the dev sequence file is walking through it and handling the
> netdev in the same time.
> 
> To minimize this critical section and drastically reduce the time rcu lock
> is being held, all we need is to grab the rcu lock only for the brief
> moment where we are looking for the next netdev to handle, if found,
> dev_hold it to guarantee it kept alive while accessed later in seq show
> callback and release the rcu lock immediately.
> 
> The current netdev being handled will be released "dev_put" when the seq next
> callback is called or dev seq stop is called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>

The tradeoff here is that now you are doing two unnecessary atomic
operations per stats dump.

That is what the RCU lock allows us to avoid.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-10 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10 17:08 [RFC net-next 1/2] net: net-porcfs: Reduce rcu lock critical section Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-10 17:08 ` [RFC net-next 2/2] net: net-sysfs: Reduce netstat_show read_lock " Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-10 17:17   ` David Miller
2018-04-10 17:16 ` David Miller [this message]
2018-04-10 20:35   ` [RFC net-next 1/2] net: net-porcfs: Reduce rcu lock " Eric Dumazet
2018-04-11 18:59     ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-11 22:30       ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-11 23:47         ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-12  2:59           ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-12 19:12             ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-16 20:50               ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-16 21:07                 ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180410.131649.583776764903333305.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.